Dynasty Superflex PPR TE Premium Startup Draft Review

1
00:00:12,080 --> 00:00:16,920
Hello and welcome back to Lab 52
at Dynasty Football Podcast.

2
00:00:17,240 --> 00:00:20,680
I'm one of your hosts at Tecmo
Weave, joined again by my Co

3
00:00:20,680 --> 00:00:24,520
host Weapon X.
Once again, this is not Dynasty

4
00:00:24,520 --> 00:00:27,400
advice.
This is Dynasty insight.

5
00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:30,080
Weapon X, you and I talked about
that.

6
00:00:30,080 --> 00:00:32,159
We like that.
This is dynasty insight, isn't

7
00:00:32,159 --> 00:00:34,400
it?
Oh yeah, for sure, man.

8
00:00:34,720 --> 00:00:37,800
Any time you talk to ISD
football and you're going

9
00:00:37,800 --> 00:00:40,400
through the draft and, you know,
startups and you're, you're just

10
00:00:40,400 --> 00:00:43,320
giving your insight on on how
you see these picks going.

11
00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:46,400
And you know, I think there's a
lot of, obviously there's tons

12
00:00:46,400 --> 00:00:49,960
and tons of shows out there, but
you know, you give your best

13
00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:54,720
insight based on the information
you have at hand. 100% if you

14
00:00:54,720 --> 00:00:57,440
want all the analytics and the
statistics.

15
00:00:57,440 --> 00:01:01,280
There's other shows for that.
We're, we're just giving you

16
00:01:01,280 --> 00:01:07,280
our, our take on things from
real players, real trades, real

17
00:01:07,280 --> 00:01:11,560
participation in the fantasy
community and hopefully helping

18
00:01:11,560 --> 00:01:14,280
anyone that's listening to, to
make the, the best choice they

19
00:01:14,280 --> 00:01:15,920
can to have the best team
possible.

20
00:01:17,400 --> 00:01:22,640
And today we're going to cover a
recent startup I was a part of

21
00:01:22,640 --> 00:01:27,240
and the startup draft.
This is a 12 team league.

22
00:01:27,240 --> 00:01:31,720
It's PPR, tight end, premium
super flex league start 10.

23
00:01:32,680 --> 00:01:36,080
To my knowledge it's pretty
standard for what a lot of

24
00:01:36,080 --> 00:01:37,960
players are looking for
nowadays.

25
00:01:38,600 --> 00:01:43,400
You got that extra .5 points for
the tight end reception, a

26
00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:50,680
slight bump in yardage, just one
point PPR for running backs and

27
00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:54,640
wide receivers, and a four point
touchdowns for, for the

28
00:01:54,640 --> 00:01:56,640
quarterback.
So that's pretty standard.

29
00:01:57,040 --> 00:02:01,320
And we're not going to go over
every pick from every round.

30
00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:05,320
We, we may name some of them
off, we may actually name them

31
00:02:05,320 --> 00:02:07,400
off, but we're not going to
cover every player.

32
00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:10,759
We don't have the time for that.
And it's really about a question

33
00:02:10,759 --> 00:02:14,600
of so, you know, in a real
draft, where are these players

34
00:02:14,600 --> 00:02:18,720
going?
And you know, here, here's some

35
00:02:18,800 --> 00:02:27,600
here's some insight, not advice.
So we'll we'll start with the

36
00:02:27,600 --> 00:02:30,040
first round here.
And this this just took place.

37
00:02:30,040 --> 00:02:33,280
Looks like it started on April
7th and it ended last week.

38
00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:38,160
So this is at this point, it's a
couple weeks old, but other than

39
00:02:38,160 --> 00:02:41,720
that Giants and Bengals trade,
not a whole lot has changed.

40
00:02:41,720 --> 00:02:44,880
Did you see that Giants and
Bengals trade The Yeah, Dexter.

41
00:02:44,880 --> 00:02:47,520
Was it Dexter Lawrence right A a
top ten pick?

42
00:02:47,520 --> 00:02:49,400
Yes, I did see that.
That's that's a big trade.

43
00:02:49,400 --> 00:02:51,760
Absolutely.
I know the the Bengals lost

44
00:02:51,760 --> 00:02:55,360
Henderson, so they really they
came right back and got Dexter

45
00:02:55,360 --> 00:02:58,120
Lawrence, an absolute tremendous
addition to their defensive

46
00:02:58,120 --> 00:03:00,280
line.
But yeah, that was a huge trade.

47
00:03:00,760 --> 00:03:04,040
You don't see them too often in
the top ten like that, but that

48
00:03:04,040 --> 00:03:05,920
was that was an interesting
trade.

49
00:03:05,920 --> 00:03:07,440
It was.
It was really fun to see it.

50
00:03:08,360 --> 00:03:12,320
Yeah, it scares scares me a bit
for I mean, yes, if you have

51
00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:16,200
Jackson Dart, you want him to
get some more weapons, but I I

52
00:03:16,200 --> 00:03:19,840
hate to see one of the top
rookie wide receivers go there

53
00:03:20,320 --> 00:03:24,680
and automatically play second
fiddle to Malik neighbors.

54
00:03:24,840 --> 00:03:27,600
It really you're you're just
automatically going into a

55
00:03:27,600 --> 00:03:32,480
situation where your ceiling is
capped and and that really would

56
00:03:32,480 --> 00:03:35,760
kind of douse some of the
excitement, I think for that

57
00:03:35,760 --> 00:03:39,600
rookie landing spot that that's
if they pick a wide receiver.

58
00:03:40,720 --> 00:03:44,160
I mean, maybe it's a, you know,
slightly more of an arrow up for

59
00:03:44,160 --> 00:03:46,960
for Jackson dart.
Yeah, 100%.

60
00:03:46,960 --> 00:03:48,640
It'll be really, really
interesting to see what they do

61
00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:49,880
now.
They have two picks down the

62
00:03:49,880 --> 00:03:53,320
top, the top 10.
So this is a huge, huge draft

63
00:03:53,320 --> 00:03:55,440
for them in the future of their
team.

64
00:03:55,440 --> 00:03:58,600
So I know a lot of people are,
you know, cross their fingers

65
00:03:58,600 --> 00:04:03,000
for Scatterbo, hoping Jeremiah
Love even either goes before or

66
00:04:03,000 --> 00:04:05,280
the Giants pass up on them.
It's it's going to be exciting.

67
00:04:05,280 --> 00:04:08,680
We're only a few days here from
the draft and it's always a big,

68
00:04:08,680 --> 00:04:12,160
big time and dynasty.
A lot of player values go up, go

69
00:04:12,160 --> 00:04:17,279
down, and some some panic can
start to to be driven in in

70
00:04:17,360 --> 00:04:19,720
through the dynasty leagues.
But it's exciting.

71
00:04:19,720 --> 00:04:22,160
It's it's going to be a really,
really fun draft, as it always

72
00:04:22,160 --> 00:04:25,480
is.
Absolutely, absolutely.

73
00:04:25,480 --> 00:04:29,120
Well, this draft from the
startup that we were in or that

74
00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:35,280
I was in, it started like most
draft startups start and I still

75
00:04:35,280 --> 00:04:38,320
feel like he's not he shouldn't
be the number one pick.

76
00:04:38,320 --> 00:04:42,120
It's Josh Allen.
Josh Allen goes as the 11.

77
00:04:42,720 --> 00:04:46,160
I feel like if you're taking a
quarterback there, why isn't it

78
00:04:46,160 --> 00:04:50,600
Drake May and and I mean, maybe
that's a good question.

79
00:04:50,600 --> 00:04:54,560
You know, to hear your feeling
on that now, this is, you know,

80
00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:58,480
the second time in in the last
month or so I've seen Josh Allen

81
00:04:58,480 --> 00:05:00,800
goes number one.
People seem to think like, oh,

82
00:05:00,800 --> 00:05:04,080
he's he's a young guy.
This is going to keep going

83
00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:07,120
forever.
Russian quarterbacks, you know,

84
00:05:07,120 --> 00:05:09,160
you don't you don't see them run
forever.

85
00:05:10,760 --> 00:05:13,720
And when he got Drake May and
he's looking really good.

86
00:05:13,720 --> 00:05:17,920
And I mean, he's Josh Allen just
a handful of years ago, right?

87
00:05:17,920 --> 00:05:21,840
He's he's running, he's younger,
he's got the, you know, his

88
00:05:21,840 --> 00:05:25,720
whole future ahead of him and
Josh Allen, he's, I don't know,

89
00:05:25,720 --> 00:05:29,040
is it, I mean, I hate to say, I
mean, you can't say that the

90
00:05:29,040 --> 00:05:31,920
best years are in front of him,
can you?

91
00:05:32,640 --> 00:05:35,840
Yeah, I mean, I think when it
comes to Josh Allen, Drake, May,

92
00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:38,800
I don't think you're going to be
upset having either one officer

93
00:05:38,800 --> 00:05:40,480
or the team.
I think when it comes down to

94
00:05:40,480 --> 00:05:43,320
Allen going over May and drafts,
I think it's just more of the

95
00:05:43,800 --> 00:05:46,440
the the comfort zone, knowing
what you're going to get

96
00:05:46,440 --> 00:05:50,320
currently right now, Drake May
has been tremendous, absolutely

97
00:05:50,320 --> 00:05:51,960
has been.
But obviously we need to see him

98
00:05:51,960 --> 00:05:54,640
do it for a couple more years
for him to be truly established

99
00:05:54,640 --> 00:05:57,840
as that tremendous option that
you have no concern about.

100
00:05:57,880 --> 00:06:01,320
I mean, obviously last two last
year was absolutely amazing.

101
00:06:01,400 --> 00:06:04,080
I mean, and upside is very, very
high for him.

102
00:06:04,080 --> 00:06:08,360
We know that 23 years old turn
to 24 in August and if they

103
00:06:08,360 --> 00:06:10,240
acquire A.J.
Brown, which is start a trend

104
00:06:10,240 --> 00:06:13,240
more and more likely as we saw
reports earlier today, it's

105
00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:15,880
looking highly, highly likely
that they do acquire him.

106
00:06:16,160 --> 00:06:21,240
And if that is the case, he gets
his number 1A type receiver and

107
00:06:21,240 --> 00:06:23,840
obviously the stock will go up.
And I think what if you see

108
00:06:23,840 --> 00:06:26,680
startup drafts take place around
that time, I think you may start

109
00:06:26,680 --> 00:06:30,200
to see a shift between Allen and
May as far as which one gets

110
00:06:30,200 --> 00:06:33,480
picked ahead of each other.
I would expect May to get picked

111
00:06:33,640 --> 00:06:37,560
more, more times than not ahead
of on if A.J.

112
00:06:37,560 --> 00:06:38,840
Brown lands.
What do you think about that?

113
00:06:40,160 --> 00:06:42,440
I think that's fair.
That's fair.

114
00:06:42,440 --> 00:06:45,880
I mean, I, I guess I'm sort of
already reading the tea leaves

115
00:06:46,360 --> 00:06:49,920
that it should have already been
time for Drake May to go 1st.

116
00:06:51,440 --> 00:06:55,800
And, and I guess maybe sometimes
it just takes the news to come

117
00:06:55,800 --> 00:07:00,520
out for the reality to set in
that Oh yeah, you know, Drake

118
00:07:00,520 --> 00:07:04,760
May has a new weapon and people
see things, you know, if it's

119
00:07:04,760 --> 00:07:10,040
5149 in favor of Allen and it
flips come middle of May.

120
00:07:10,960 --> 00:07:13,320
But I've heard A.J.
Brown is supposed to be a post

121
00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:16,280
June 1st cut or a post June 1st
trade.

122
00:07:17,200 --> 00:07:20,480
So OK, these, these trades that
are, are going to start to hit

123
00:07:20,480 --> 00:07:24,960
in the middle of June, early
July, maybe it flips at that

124
00:07:24,960 --> 00:07:28,040
point.
I, I'd be doing it now, though.

125
00:07:28,040 --> 00:07:32,360
That's, that's just for me.
I I prioritize, you know, age.

126
00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:34,080
Oh yeah, as.
A start up.

127
00:07:34,480 --> 00:07:38,040
Yeah, I, I, I completely
understand that reasoning and I

128
00:07:38,080 --> 00:07:40,000
think a lot of people are
thinking that way as well.

129
00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:45,000
I think when there is what the
one position you can not worry

130
00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:47,520
as much about a quarterback
entering their 30s.

131
00:07:47,560 --> 00:07:50,000
I mean, a player ending in their
30s is the quarterback position

132
00:07:50,000 --> 00:07:53,960
just because of how much longer
they're usually able to play.

133
00:07:53,960 --> 00:07:57,720
But like you said, Allen style
play can lend to, you know,

134
00:07:57,720 --> 00:07:59,840
breaking down.
But he is a bigger player and he

135
00:07:59,840 --> 00:08:03,120
he he's usually the one not
taking the brunt of those hits.

136
00:08:03,120 --> 00:08:05,200
He the other receiving end is
taking those hits.

137
00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:10,440
But again, it just really comes
down to how comfortable you are

138
00:08:10,440 --> 00:08:12,320
with Alan the next two to three
years.

139
00:08:12,320 --> 00:08:15,680
How do you think he still has
more to more, you know, a more

140
00:08:15,680 --> 00:08:18,200
upside to calm?
I mean, he's been absolutely

141
00:08:18,200 --> 00:08:20,480
amazing.
I mean, he's finishes within the

142
00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:23,920
top four year after year.
So I think that's why if someone

143
00:08:23,920 --> 00:08:26,880
picks him over at May, it's more
of just having that comfort

144
00:08:26,880 --> 00:08:29,160
knowing this is what I got and
this is what he's been doing

145
00:08:29,160 --> 00:08:31,360
recently and I don't really have
to worry about it right now.

146
00:08:32,520 --> 00:08:34,440
I think that's fair, That's
fair.

147
00:08:34,440 --> 00:08:40,120
And I guess in all fairness,
maybe Josh Allen is the safer

148
00:08:40,120 --> 00:08:43,600
pick.
He's a safer pick, but your your

149
00:08:43,600 --> 00:08:48,400
ceiling could maybe be a little
bit higher going into the future

150
00:08:48,400 --> 00:08:50,320
with Drake May.
Yeah, for sure.

151
00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:52,800
One more thing.
In the Superflex League,

152
00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:56,720
obviously quarterback values are
elevated out, you know, and when

153
00:08:56,720 --> 00:09:00,480
you have Drake May at the AG is
compared to Josh Allen.

154
00:09:00,920 --> 00:09:05,120
If Drake May has another very
solid year, he's in the top five

155
00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:07,600
quarterbacks now trade value,
you always have to think about

156
00:09:07,600 --> 00:09:10,360
that.
Allen's value will not be any

157
00:09:10,360 --> 00:09:12,000
higher.
I think that it is currently

158
00:09:12,520 --> 00:09:15,680
May's value can reach Allen's
and exceed it if he has a

159
00:09:15,680 --> 00:09:17,800
tremendous year.
So you think about that too.

160
00:09:17,800 --> 00:09:20,800
If you're drafting May ahead of
Allen, you have an asset that's

161
00:09:20,800 --> 00:09:23,520
going to possibly continue to
raise in value as the next

162
00:09:23,520 --> 00:09:27,240
couple years go on.
Exactly, exactly.

163
00:09:27,240 --> 00:09:28,520
Yeah.
You want to have a little bit of

164
00:09:28,520 --> 00:09:33,320
room for growth, but yeah, I I
guess we'll see how things play

165
00:09:33,320 --> 00:09:37,160
out over the next month to two
months and we'll we'll we'll see

166
00:09:37,160 --> 00:09:42,040
if our predictions are right
barring or dependent upon that

167
00:09:42,040 --> 00:09:43,120
A.J.
Brown trade.

168
00:09:45,240 --> 00:09:50,040
All right, the rest of the first
round at one O 3, we had Bijan

169
00:09:50,040 --> 00:09:52,880
Robinson.
At one O 4, we got Jamir Gibbs.

170
00:09:53,200 --> 00:09:58,840
One O 5 we got Jackson Smith and
Jigba one O 6, Mark Chase one O

171
00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:05,360
7, Jane Daniels one O 8 Puka
Nakua one O 9 and I remember

172
00:10:05,360 --> 00:10:08,040
when this was on the clock, you
and I talked about it.

173
00:10:08,720 --> 00:10:11,280
Trey McBride.
This is a tight end premium

174
00:10:11,280 --> 00:10:17,240
league and for reference, he was
the 4th highest scoring player

175
00:10:17,600 --> 00:10:22,040
in this format last year.
So that provides a bit of

176
00:10:22,040 --> 00:10:25,680
context to things.
Why Trey McBride would go one O

177
00:10:25,680 --> 00:10:32,000
9110, you got Malik Neighbors,
111, Lamar Jackson and rounding

178
00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:34,960
out the first round you got
Brock Bowers at 112.

179
00:10:35,880 --> 00:10:39,880
Is there one pick in there that
stands out to you that you want

180
00:10:39,880 --> 00:10:43,040
to cover?
Yeah, I think a lot of it's

181
00:10:43,040 --> 00:10:44,440
standard.
The running backs, the

182
00:10:44,440 --> 00:10:47,200
receivers, you know, they're
going there usually when we see

183
00:10:47,200 --> 00:10:49,520
these drafts.
But I think you, but you touched

184
00:10:49,520 --> 00:10:51,920
on Trey McBride, they're not
that it's a bad pick.

185
00:10:51,920 --> 00:10:54,640
You mentioned the amount of
points he had in this format.

186
00:10:54,840 --> 00:10:59,160
Obviously, if he's number four
overall in this type of format,

187
00:10:59,280 --> 00:11:02,000
it's you know, obviously you're
going to you're going to really

188
00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:04,720
be thinking hard about, you
know, take him at that spot.

189
00:11:05,200 --> 00:11:11,680
I just think it's always hard to
take a tight end at one O 9.

190
00:11:11,880 --> 00:11:14,960
I feel it just feels like you're
drafting him specifically at his

191
00:11:14,960 --> 00:11:17,920
ceiling.
And I don't know, I mean, we

192
00:11:17,920 --> 00:11:20,760
just saw him have quite possibly
the best season he's going to

193
00:11:20,760 --> 00:11:23,680
have in his entire career.
And then I see other players in

194
00:11:23,680 --> 00:11:26,680
his first round that they
haven't had that type of season

195
00:11:26,680 --> 00:11:30,960
where they they can actually get
a little higher overall in their

196
00:11:30,960 --> 00:11:32,920
the next couple years.
They could reach the ceiling

197
00:11:32,920 --> 00:11:37,400
that they haven't reached yet.
I don't dislike having trade

198
00:11:37,400 --> 00:11:38,680
with pride on my team,
obviously.

199
00:11:38,680 --> 00:11:41,920
I just think there could have
been a little more value to be

200
00:11:41,920 --> 00:11:44,320
had at that pick and he could
have possibly got him.

201
00:11:44,720 --> 00:11:47,440
I mean, obviously with Brock
Bauer's going on 1/12, I don't

202
00:11:47,440 --> 00:11:50,120
know how much longer he would
have lasted if he didn't take

203
00:11:50,120 --> 00:11:52,560
him here.
But I think there you you build

204
00:11:52,560 --> 00:11:57,240
your roster and you feel better
if you have a cornerstone

205
00:11:57,240 --> 00:12:00,320
receiver, maybe a quarterback
there and then maybe got tight

206
00:12:00,320 --> 00:12:02,600
end in the second round.
But if you are going to take a

207
00:12:02,600 --> 00:12:05,200
tight end in the first round,
it's clear as day it's going to

208
00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:07,440
be hours of McBride, no one
else.

209
00:12:07,440 --> 00:12:09,880
There is no other discussion to
be had as those two guys.

210
00:12:10,360 --> 00:12:13,720
But I'll say I would feel not as
comfortable with with McBride at

211
00:12:13,720 --> 00:12:18,400
One O 9 just because I don't
know how much more you can get

212
00:12:18,760 --> 00:12:20,040
outside of what you got last
year.

213
00:12:20,040 --> 00:12:23,760
And I think your team
construction just feels better

214
00:12:23,760 --> 00:12:26,920
and it looks better if you start
on a on a different position.

215
00:12:28,520 --> 00:12:32,080
I I tend to agree with that.
I mean, I'm just glancing at the

216
00:12:32,080 --> 00:12:40,320
stats here. 126 receptions, 1239
yards, 11 touchdowns, and almost

217
00:12:40,320 --> 00:12:44,680
170 targets.
We were we're supposed to assume

218
00:12:44,680 --> 00:12:48,640
Jacoby Brissett's going to
replicate this Or, or.

219
00:12:48,640 --> 00:12:53,920
You're right, somehow he's going
to exceed this in his age 27

220
00:12:53,920 --> 00:12:57,000
season.
He'll be turning 27 near the end

221
00:12:57,000 --> 00:13:00,720
of November.
You're right, this is about

222
00:13:00,720 --> 00:13:02,520
drafting someone at their
ceiling.

223
00:13:04,040 --> 00:13:08,120
And while I get it, the the
tight end pool is somewhat

224
00:13:08,120 --> 00:13:12,160
shallow for elite talent.
If if you're going to do this

225
00:13:12,160 --> 00:13:15,680
and almost I, I'm a little bit
more surprised that people

226
00:13:15,680 --> 00:13:19,560
didn't look at Brock Bowers and
say, well, at least he's a lot

227
00:13:19,560 --> 00:13:24,160
younger.
And his situation is, you know,

228
00:13:24,280 --> 00:13:27,640
equally as bad as as training
brides is this year.

229
00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:32,800
So we can assume he'll be
heavily targeted in the offense

230
00:13:33,120 --> 00:13:36,760
and he he should put up this
elite season and I'll have this

231
00:13:36,760 --> 00:13:41,080
positional advantage.
I don't know.

232
00:13:41,120 --> 00:13:42,520
I mean, I don't, I don't hate
the pick.

233
00:13:42,520 --> 00:13:44,440
I guess I'll have to see how
these teams do.

234
00:13:45,400 --> 00:13:49,000
But in this draft, the the top
tight ends went off the board

235
00:13:49,000 --> 00:13:52,360
really fast.
And as, as we, we move

236
00:13:52,360 --> 00:13:56,360
throughout most of this draft
here and it's a 23 round draft.

237
00:13:56,360 --> 00:14:00,000
So we'll we'll do our best to
only kind of hit some more of

238
00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:04,440
the highlights and move on.
You'll see that the the tight

239
00:14:04,440 --> 00:14:07,320
ends went really fast.
There were there were teams

240
00:14:07,320 --> 00:14:09,880
specifically targeting tight
ends only.

241
00:14:10,240 --> 00:14:15,600
So I guess in that sense this
was a smart move, but it is a

242
00:14:15,600 --> 00:14:18,680
player at their ceiling.
It's also a good reminder know

243
00:14:18,760 --> 00:14:22,960
your scoring format.
Don't just listen to the show or

244
00:14:22,960 --> 00:14:26,880
look at the rankings because all
of those things can vary.

245
00:14:27,240 --> 00:14:32,120
Whether the default for a
website is .5 PPR, it's not

246
00:14:32,120 --> 00:14:35,120
taking due to account your tight
end premium.

247
00:14:36,960 --> 00:14:41,720
You really need to be aware of
your scoring format before you

248
00:14:41,720 --> 00:14:43,880
start to decide who the top
players are.

249
00:14:44,000 --> 00:14:47,040
And I mean, that may sound
simple, but I think a lot of

250
00:14:47,040 --> 00:14:51,080
people may forget that.
Yeah, I I agree.

251
00:14:51,120 --> 00:14:53,880
Actually scoring format,
obviously that matters a lot.

252
00:14:53,880 --> 00:14:58,280
And like I said, in this format,
traded by is extremely valuable.

253
00:14:59,360 --> 00:15:02,080
But yeah, I think Brock Bowers,
Trey McBride, it's going to be a

254
00:15:02,440 --> 00:15:05,080
discussion for the remainder of
the offseason which one gets

255
00:15:05,080 --> 00:15:09,200
picked ahead of each other.
But I'm, I personally am much

256
00:15:09,200 --> 00:15:11,160
more comfortable with them going
in the second round.

257
00:15:11,160 --> 00:15:13,720
I just think you could start
your team with a different

258
00:15:13,720 --> 00:15:16,160
player with your first pick.
And then when you if you go back

259
00:15:16,160 --> 00:15:19,240
around and pick Bob McBride or
or Bowers in your second round,

260
00:15:19,240 --> 00:15:21,600
I think you're going to really
like your roster construction a

261
00:15:21,600 --> 00:15:25,000
little better just because
you're piggybacking with a tight

262
00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:26,400
end instead of starting with a
tight end.

263
00:15:27,480 --> 00:15:30,200
Absolutely.
Well, do you want to cover the

264
00:15:30,200 --> 00:15:32,280
the second round here?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.

265
00:15:32,280 --> 00:15:33,680
Second round.
The first pick in the second

266
00:15:33,680 --> 00:15:36,920
round was Caleb Williams that we
had Ashton Gente and Jeremiah

267
00:15:36,920 --> 00:15:39,920
Love.
Trevor Lawrence was pick 2O four

268
00:15:39,920 --> 00:15:42,320
and Joe Joe Burr 2O5.
I'll stop there.

269
00:15:42,320 --> 00:15:44,960
What do you see there?
Did you see anything out of the

270
00:15:44,960 --> 00:15:47,720
norm?
I I, I see one, but what about?

271
00:15:47,720 --> 00:15:50,040
What do you think?
Trevor Lawrence.

272
00:15:50,040 --> 00:15:52,880
That felt a little bit high for
Trevor Lawrence.

273
00:15:54,000 --> 00:15:56,840
Yep, Yep, that's what I saw too.
I, I think you you could get

274
00:15:56,840 --> 00:15:58,640
Trevor Lawrence a little bit
later there.

275
00:15:58,640 --> 00:16:01,080
I've seen him go in third round
many, many drafts.

276
00:16:01,080 --> 00:16:05,280
But if you want to start, he
obviously has the team here,

277
00:16:05,280 --> 00:16:08,280
obviously has Trevor Lawrence
high on his board as far as the

278
00:16:08,280 --> 00:16:10,600
quarterback goes.
And he let's see what he got

279
00:16:10,600 --> 00:16:12,720
here in the first round.
He is the Trey McBride team.

280
00:16:12,720 --> 00:16:15,280
So he started his team with Trey
McBride and Trevor Lawrence.

281
00:16:15,880 --> 00:16:18,920
I think he's again, I think
those players could be drafted

282
00:16:18,920 --> 00:16:22,440
after a ceiling while while
their ceilings are extremely

283
00:16:22,440 --> 00:16:27,480
high, I think there's just
better value at these picks in

284
00:16:27,480 --> 00:16:31,000
in these situations here.
So yeah, I think that's the only

285
00:16:31,000 --> 00:16:32,920
one I see there.
Ashton Gente, Jeremiah Love.

286
00:16:32,920 --> 00:16:34,800
They're very, very close in the
rankings.

287
00:16:34,800 --> 00:16:37,800
So I think you're thrilled to
get either of them in the second

288
00:16:37,800 --> 00:16:40,280
round.
I've seen Jeremiah love pick one

289
00:16:40,280 --> 00:16:41,920
O one.
I've seen them go.

290
00:16:42,320 --> 00:16:47,280
I've seen him go more in the one
O 9, the 112 range recently and

291
00:16:47,280 --> 00:16:49,200
Ashton Gentie right about where
he's at right here.

292
00:16:49,200 --> 00:16:50,880
So I don't see anything out of
the norm there.

293
00:16:51,640 --> 00:16:53,440
Caleb Williams?
Yeah, absolutely is.

294
00:16:53,880 --> 00:16:56,920
The arrow is pointing up and a
lot of times he's been going to

295
00:16:56,920 --> 00:16:59,360
first round, so no issue there.
If you want to get Caleb

296
00:16:59,360 --> 00:17:00,360
Williams there in the second
round.

297
00:17:01,360 --> 00:17:06,319
SO2O6 we have Patrick Mahomes,
then I'm around St.

298
00:17:06,319 --> 00:17:11,400
Brown and two O 7.
Then AT2O8, Omarion Hampton Boe

299
00:17:11,400 --> 00:17:15,160
Knicks two O 9.
Then we had JJ Justin Jefferson

300
00:17:15,160 --> 00:17:19,960
at 211, CD Lamb at 2.
I mean Justin Jefferson was 210

301
00:17:20,000 --> 00:17:26,280
my mistake, 211 CD Lamb and then
212 was Jalen Hertz a little run

302
00:17:26,280 --> 00:17:29,080
there in receivers, obviously
some elite receivers there,

303
00:17:29,080 --> 00:17:31,600
Amaral, Sam Brown, Jefferson and
CD Lamb.

304
00:17:32,160 --> 00:17:35,920
Extreme value I think for either
Lamb or Jefferson, their end of

305
00:17:35,920 --> 00:17:37,920
the second round, that's really,
really good strong value for

306
00:17:37,920 --> 00:17:40,560
them.
I think that's what, for me,

307
00:17:40,560 --> 00:17:43,320
that's what I see that points
out the most and that sticks out

308
00:17:43,320 --> 00:17:46,360
the most is that Jefferson and
Lamb, you were able to get them

309
00:17:46,360 --> 00:17:50,480
at the end of the second.
So you're talking the 23 #22 and

310
00:17:50,480 --> 00:17:53,520
23 overall player in the draft.
I think that's really good value

311
00:17:53,520 --> 00:17:56,880
for those guys.
That's that was what stood out

312
00:17:56,880 --> 00:18:00,240
to me in the second round here
at Lamb and Jefferson at the

313
00:18:00,240 --> 00:18:05,000
10th and 11th pick.
Certainly the fantasy pros mock

314
00:18:05,000 --> 00:18:06,800
draft program didn't see it that
way.

315
00:18:06,800 --> 00:18:11,360
Those they were always
consistently first round players

316
00:18:11,800 --> 00:18:14,240
and they have been for the last
few years.

317
00:18:14,240 --> 00:18:19,480
But you know, after this year, I
mean, you know, they're going to

318
00:18:19,480 --> 00:18:21,000
be once you know, let's take a
look here.

319
00:18:21,000 --> 00:18:23,960
I believe they're both in their
age 27 season.

320
00:18:23,960 --> 00:18:30,360
Yep, turning 27 in June and he
already turned 27.

321
00:18:30,720 --> 00:18:33,760
OK, so both will be 27 next year
are going to be 28.

322
00:18:35,120 --> 00:18:37,800
I would tend to think that, you
know, maybe this is a

323
00:18:38,840 --> 00:18:46,080
foreshadowing a year from now
that can you really justify a

324
00:18:46,080 --> 00:18:49,920
number one pick or a very, very
early second round pick of a

325
00:18:49,920 --> 00:18:55,200
startup on a 28 year old player?
I I don't think you can.

326
00:18:55,200 --> 00:19:00,480
I, I don't really care who who
they are because once again,

327
00:19:00,480 --> 00:19:04,320
that's all part of the startup.
You want to have some runway to

328
00:19:04,800 --> 00:19:09,440
keep these players or at least
for their value to, to grow or

329
00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:11,680
for their you're not going to,
you don't want to hit the age

330
00:19:11,680 --> 00:19:18,080
Cliff right away.
So no, I on one hand, it's, it's

331
00:19:18,080 --> 00:19:20,960
a tremendous value.
On the second hand, it feels

332
00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:25,680
like a passing of the guard that
that these two kind of

333
00:19:25,680 --> 00:19:28,920
cornerstone players have now
fallen into the late 2nd.

334
00:19:28,920 --> 00:19:35,320
But I'm sure this may not be a
reflection of other startups.

335
00:19:36,640 --> 00:19:39,240
I would tend to think some
people may just look at Justin

336
00:19:39,240 --> 00:19:43,520
Jefferson and CD Lamb and say,
hey, I'll take the wide receiver

337
00:19:43,520 --> 00:19:47,320
one season, JJ that he had one
down year.

338
00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:52,600
You know, of the two, who's more
risky, CD Lamb or Justin

339
00:19:52,600 --> 00:19:55,560
Jefferson?
I, I, I mean, I would imagine

340
00:19:55,560 --> 00:19:58,520
it's, it's clear that it would
be Justin Jefferson, right?

341
00:19:58,920 --> 00:20:01,840
If you had to pick one of the
two here and you have you have

342
00:20:02,120 --> 00:20:05,160
that pick which, which older
wide receiver are you going to

343
00:20:05,160 --> 00:20:07,240
take, Justin Jefferson or CD
Lamb?

344
00:20:07,880 --> 00:20:10,560
Yeah.
I mean, a risk wise, risk wise,

345
00:20:10,560 --> 00:20:11,760
yeah.
Jefferson, just because the

346
00:20:11,760 --> 00:20:13,640
quarterback situation with
Dallas, we know who the

347
00:20:13,640 --> 00:20:16,160
quarterback is and we don't have
to be concerned about that at

348
00:20:16,160 --> 00:20:19,400
all.
I just think, man, I just think

349
00:20:19,400 --> 00:20:23,080
the body of work with Justin
Jefferson, I, I think with one

350
00:20:23,080 --> 00:20:27,720
down year, if he, we've said it
before, if Justin Jefferson even

351
00:20:27,720 --> 00:20:30,920
gets average QB play from
whoever it is this year,

352
00:20:31,440 --> 00:20:34,160
assuming it's going to be Kyler
Murray, even if it's average, I

353
00:20:34,160 --> 00:20:36,000
think we're going to, we're
going to see Jefferson bounce

354
00:20:36,000 --> 00:20:37,280
back.
I I just think we will.

355
00:20:37,280 --> 00:20:41,480
And I think with CD Lamb, on the
other hand, he is starting to

356
00:20:41,600 --> 00:20:43,960
land in his spot in a lot of
startup drafts.

357
00:20:43,960 --> 00:20:46,000
I've noticed.
I know the one we were in a few

358
00:20:46,000 --> 00:20:48,400
weeks, a few weeks back, he was
more of a later second round

359
00:20:48,400 --> 00:20:52,480
pick as well.
Justin Jefferson, I think has

360
00:20:52,480 --> 00:20:54,560
been going much earlier than
what I've seen here.

361
00:20:55,200 --> 00:20:58,120
I would say earlier in the
second round, maybe in the two O

362
00:20:58,120 --> 00:21:00,160
2 to two O 5 range.
I've been seeing him a lot.

363
00:21:00,600 --> 00:21:03,800
So I think based on, you know,
relative to the other startups

364
00:21:03,800 --> 00:21:06,760
that I've been seeing, I think
this is decent value for him.

365
00:21:06,800 --> 00:21:10,360
More risk on the Jefferson side.
But I think the body of work I'm

366
00:21:10,360 --> 00:21:12,960
better than all Justin Jefferson
if he if he just gets average

367
00:21:12,960 --> 00:21:15,360
Phoebe play.
Yeah.

368
00:21:15,360 --> 00:21:18,560
And he and he doesn't have to
compete with most likely George

369
00:21:18,560 --> 00:21:21,960
Pickens.
We'll assume that that Jerry

370
00:21:21,960 --> 00:21:25,240
works out something with George
and it's, it's a, it's a OK.

371
00:21:25,760 --> 00:21:28,600
Yeah, and that that's, that's,
that's the thing about CD Lamb.

372
00:21:28,600 --> 00:21:32,040
Like I think CD Lamb is an
outstanding player, but there

373
00:21:32,040 --> 00:21:35,440
wasn't, there hasn't been a time
that he's had a George Pickens,

374
00:21:35,560 --> 00:21:38,640
you know, type of talent across
the side.

375
00:21:38,640 --> 00:21:41,240
You know, we, so we know what
Pickens can do.

376
00:21:41,240 --> 00:21:42,760
We know what he can do when he's
featured.

377
00:21:43,440 --> 00:21:45,800
So let's see how that works out
now, this year, now it's going

378
00:21:45,800 --> 00:21:48,720
to be Year 2 with them together.
If they are, you know, if

379
00:21:48,720 --> 00:21:51,280
they're able to play healthy all
season, let's see how those

380
00:21:51,280 --> 00:21:53,200
targets divvy up.
They're going to throw the ball

381
00:21:53,200 --> 00:21:54,200
out.
So there's going to be enough

382
00:21:54,200 --> 00:21:57,200
for both.
But when you had CD Lamb in

383
00:21:57,200 --> 00:21:59,920
previous years, you were
counting on that high target

384
00:21:59,920 --> 00:22:01,960
volume.
Is it going to still be there?

385
00:22:01,960 --> 00:22:03,120
We're going to find out coming
up.

386
00:22:04,560 --> 00:22:07,720
Yeah, definitely, definitely.
Well, that closes out round two.

387
00:22:08,400 --> 00:22:12,280
I'll cover round 3 now and you
and I have talked about this.

388
00:22:12,280 --> 00:22:16,480
It starts to feel like these are
the rounds where there's just a

389
00:22:16,480 --> 00:22:20,800
lot of value to be had that if
you wanted to, you could trade

390
00:22:20,800 --> 00:22:24,520
down into these rounds.
And some of these players

391
00:22:24,520 --> 00:22:29,600
certainly have wide receiver,
running back, quarterback, one

392
00:22:30,440 --> 00:22:33,480
upside to them.
There's a lot of excitement with

393
00:22:33,480 --> 00:22:38,640
players in this range and I
think that's because there's we.

394
00:22:38,640 --> 00:22:41,040
We know we haven't seen their
ceiling.

395
00:22:41,520 --> 00:22:44,760
When you draft a player in the
first round, you feel like

396
00:22:44,760 --> 00:22:47,400
you've seen their ceiling and
you say I want that player.

397
00:22:48,040 --> 00:22:50,200
These are players, we haven't
seen their ceiling.

398
00:22:50,200 --> 00:22:51,720
Or maybe who knows, maybe we
have.

399
00:22:51,720 --> 00:22:56,160
Time will tell.
But at 3-1 you got Drake London.

400
00:22:56,160 --> 00:23:01,360
At 3-2 you got Ted McMillan 33
Justin Herbert, three O 4 you

401
00:23:01,360 --> 00:23:07,320
got Devon A Chan.
At three O 5 you have Jackson

402
00:23:07,320 --> 00:23:12,680
Dart, Colston Loveland at three
O 6, Tyler Warren at three O 7.

403
00:23:12,680 --> 00:23:17,080
As I said, the tight ends were
we're going fast three O 8,

404
00:23:17,280 --> 00:23:22,120
Brock Purdy three O 9 and Mecca
Egg Buca. 310 you got George

405
00:23:22,120 --> 00:23:28,000
Pickens, 311 Luther Burden and
312 James Cook.

406
00:23:29,720 --> 00:23:34,480
I'll let you you pick.
Pick one player and one pick and

407
00:23:34,480 --> 00:23:37,760
we'll we'll talk about him.
Wow, there's a lot this round.

408
00:23:38,080 --> 00:23:39,800
There's a lot of this round.
I really like the beginning of

409
00:23:39,800 --> 00:23:42,800
the round, the first two young
up and coming receivers.

410
00:23:42,800 --> 00:23:45,680
I mean, Drake London's had a few
few years in his career showing

411
00:23:45,680 --> 00:23:48,000
what he can do.
Ted McMillan, obviously his

412
00:23:48,000 --> 00:23:51,840
rookie year to put 1000 yards up
in that situation was, you know,

413
00:23:51,880 --> 00:23:54,160
that's a kudos to him.
He had a really good year.

414
00:23:54,640 --> 00:23:58,440
Bryce Young, if he can develop a
little bit more, you know, we

415
00:23:58,440 --> 00:24:01,800
know Ted McMillan doesn't have
much as far as competition, but

416
00:24:01,800 --> 00:24:03,520
we'll see what happens and maybe
they draft someone.

417
00:24:03,600 --> 00:24:06,720
We'll see what happens there.
But I think the pick that stuck

418
00:24:06,720 --> 00:24:10,680
out the most for me in this
round, I would say George

419
00:24:10,680 --> 00:24:12,800
Pickens 310.
I'm just going to say to him,

420
00:24:12,800 --> 00:24:15,440
because when you think about it,
you can get George Pickens

421
00:24:16,400 --> 00:24:19,360
basically a full round later
than CD Lamb.

422
00:24:20,360 --> 00:24:23,920
I like that value for George
Pickens because look at just, we

423
00:24:23,920 --> 00:24:26,560
just talked about it, Who is
going to be the target leader

424
00:24:26,560 --> 00:24:27,640
there?
We don't even know that.

425
00:24:28,520 --> 00:24:30,960
It could very well be CD Land,
but George Pickens not going to

426
00:24:30,960 --> 00:24:33,960
be lagging that far behind.
So getting him a full round

427
00:24:34,240 --> 00:24:38,720
later and he's younger and we
all, we were very confident.

428
00:24:38,720 --> 00:24:40,880
I'm very confident.
I think Jerry Jones will sign

429
00:24:40,880 --> 00:24:42,760
George Pickens.
That's his type of receiver and

430
00:24:42,760 --> 00:24:43,840
he likes these types of
receivers.

431
00:24:43,840 --> 00:24:45,200
I think he's going to sign him
long term.

432
00:24:45,200 --> 00:24:46,360
I don't think that's going to be
a problem.

433
00:24:47,280 --> 00:24:50,360
So if you get George Pickens at
3:10 and I've seen him draft, we

434
00:24:50,360 --> 00:24:52,280
were in, he was big much earlier
than that.

435
00:24:52,280 --> 00:24:58,440
So yeah, George Pickens 310, in
my opinion, is the my favorite

436
00:24:58,440 --> 00:25:02,840
pick of this round, James Cook
very, very closely behind him.

437
00:25:02,880 --> 00:25:07,120
And as far as value at 3:12.
Yeah, I I really like the James

438
00:25:07,120 --> 00:25:09,600
Cook 312 pick there.
Yeah.

439
00:25:10,560 --> 00:25:14,760
And I mean really start of the
fourth round for a guy that, you

440
00:25:14,760 --> 00:25:18,400
know, I, I don't know, I'd have
to see where he ranked for, for

441
00:25:18,400 --> 00:25:21,160
running backs last year, but
he's got to be like top five.

442
00:25:22,760 --> 00:25:27,920
And to get him at the start of
the fourth round, that means you

443
00:25:27,920 --> 00:25:31,920
already should in theory have,
well, I guess, OK, it's a 312,

444
00:25:31,920 --> 00:25:33,520
so you'd only have two other
players.

445
00:25:33,800 --> 00:25:37,960
That just to me seems like
really good value, especially

446
00:25:37,960 --> 00:25:44,000
when you're ranking him ahead of
players like Tyler Warren.

447
00:25:44,080 --> 00:25:47,320
Now, Tyler Warren, maybe we're
picking him because we saw all

448
00:25:47,320 --> 00:25:50,960
the tight ends go, he's young
and you, you see the future

449
00:25:50,960 --> 00:25:54,800
runway.
But in the near term with Daniel

450
00:25:54,800 --> 00:25:57,640
Jones, I mean, what are we
expecting with that?

451
00:25:57,640 --> 00:26:00,920
They're not going to pass to
anyone else, that they're not

452
00:26:00,920 --> 00:26:05,600
going to just run the ball with
Jonathan Taylor, that they're

453
00:26:05,600 --> 00:26:08,440
not going to air it out to Alec
Pierce.

454
00:26:08,720 --> 00:26:13,200
You know, he's the new Terrell
Owens of the Indianapolis Colts.

455
00:26:13,240 --> 00:26:16,000
Like, no, no, they're they're
still going to spread the ball

456
00:26:16,000 --> 00:26:22,640
around and to get a guy that
could easily be your RB one at

457
00:26:22,640 --> 00:26:24,920
the 312, that's a tremendous
value.

458
00:26:25,600 --> 00:26:27,760
And on the.
Yeah, yeah, I.

459
00:26:27,800 --> 00:26:30,720
Just want, I just want just it's
piggyback on that.

460
00:26:30,720 --> 00:26:32,080
Yeah.
James Cook at 312.

461
00:26:32,840 --> 00:26:36,920
That's like I said earlier, you
know, Pickens was my favorite of

462
00:26:36,920 --> 00:26:40,960
this round, but James Cook 312.
I mean, we're talking about a

463
00:26:40,960 --> 00:26:44,280
consistent top five running back
right now, A guy who's going to

464
00:26:44,440 --> 00:26:46,280
he's going to be in the top of
the league and carries.

465
00:26:46,280 --> 00:26:47,800
He's you're not worried about
his workload.

466
00:26:47,800 --> 00:26:49,920
He's going to get the work.
He's going to get the goal line

467
00:26:49,920 --> 00:26:51,880
work.
I know Josh Allen gets a ton of

468
00:26:51,880 --> 00:26:53,640
Russian tough sounds, but
there's plenty to be had.

469
00:26:53,640 --> 00:26:55,360
We've seen that.
We'll see what he could do there

470
00:26:55,720 --> 00:26:58,920
in the red zone, in the goal
line area 280.

471
00:26:58,920 --> 00:27:01,600
He had 309 carries last year.
That was his first year getting

472
00:27:01,600 --> 00:27:05,600
that full load and look what he
did 16121 yards, 12 touchdowns.

473
00:27:05,600 --> 00:27:07,840
They gave him that opportunity
and that's what he did with it.

474
00:27:07,840 --> 00:27:10,640
I think they're going to
continue to see that turns 27 in

475
00:27:10,640 --> 00:27:12,640
September.
But I think when you look at

476
00:27:12,640 --> 00:27:16,120
early in his career, he wasn't
getting tons and tons of work.

477
00:27:16,160 --> 00:27:17,800
So he's not overworked right
now.

478
00:27:17,800 --> 00:27:21,440
I think that's a, you know,
every 27 years years old is 27

479
00:27:21,440 --> 00:27:24,160
years old.
But workload wise, there's less

480
00:27:24,160 --> 00:27:28,840
of a concern than maybe a guy
like, you know, say a guy like

481
00:27:28,920 --> 00:27:31,760
Ashton Gente gets 300 carries
for the next three years.

482
00:27:31,760 --> 00:27:34,160
You're going to be a little more
concerned when he gets to 27

483
00:27:34,160 --> 00:27:35,480
than you are.
James Cook right now.

484
00:27:36,920 --> 00:27:38,680
Agreed.
Agreed.

485
00:27:38,680 --> 00:27:43,200
And on the flip side in this
round, while I I'm excited, I'm

486
00:27:43,200 --> 00:27:48,240
as excited about any as anyone
about Luther burden and his

487
00:27:48,360 --> 00:27:51,520
opportunity that he's going to
have to shine in Chicago this

488
00:27:51,520 --> 00:27:56,160
year.
But I don't know this and I get

489
00:27:56,160 --> 00:27:57,800
it.
You know, people go into drafts

490
00:27:57,800 --> 00:28:01,120
with different attitudes, right?
I'm going to I'm going to punt

491
00:28:01,120 --> 00:28:04,480
this year and I'm just going to
draft back and I'm going to take

492
00:28:04,480 --> 00:28:07,720
guys with high upside or I'm
only going to draft rookies or

493
00:28:07,720 --> 00:28:10,760
I'm going to draft all vets.
I want to be competitive right

494
00:28:10,760 --> 00:28:15,120
away.
It just doesn't seem to me to be

495
00:28:15,120 --> 00:28:19,600
the place to be drafting Luther
Byrne that that this is AI

496
00:28:19,600 --> 00:28:24,040
really want Luther Burden.
So I'm going to draft him a full

497
00:28:24,040 --> 00:28:28,200
round earlier than he should be
going.

498
00:28:28,720 --> 00:28:34,600
And I mean, I guess if he when
you draft him at this value,

499
00:28:34,960 --> 00:28:39,080
you're forcing it that it has to
be you had to pick right?

500
00:28:39,600 --> 00:28:43,320
And that he ends up as a high
and wide receiver 2 low and wide

501
00:28:43,320 --> 00:28:47,840
receiver one because you're
drafting him in between George

502
00:28:47,840 --> 00:28:52,080
Pickens and James Cook.
That is the type of player

503
00:28:52,080 --> 00:28:54,440
you're saying Luther Burden is
going to be.

504
00:28:55,000 --> 00:28:57,880
That just doesn't seem to me to
be a smart move.

505
00:28:57,880 --> 00:29:03,000
This is over drafting a player
when you've only seen one

506
00:29:03,000 --> 00:29:05,520
season.
We didn't we didn't see anything

507
00:29:05,520 --> 00:29:07,400
last year.
That was he.

508
00:29:07,480 --> 00:29:12,880
He didn't produce that 1000 some
yard season 10 touchdowns.

509
00:29:13,480 --> 00:29:17,160
That doesn't mean he can't, but
it just seems it's premature to

510
00:29:17,160 --> 00:29:20,640
be drafting a player like this
at this position.

511
00:29:20,920 --> 00:29:24,360
You you wait around and a half
later and if he's there, great,

512
00:29:24,760 --> 00:29:27,840
But the vet?
This was poor value drafting.

513
00:29:28,560 --> 00:29:30,120
Yeah, yeah.
And I've seen that a lot

514
00:29:30,120 --> 00:29:32,960
recently with Luther Bird and
he's been getting picked in this

515
00:29:32,960 --> 00:29:35,800
range right now.
And that's it's just bringing up

516
00:29:35,800 --> 00:29:39,120
his ADP more and more as though
as the weeks go on.

517
00:29:39,320 --> 00:29:41,680
So now you pretty much like if
you want them, you're going to

518
00:29:41,680 --> 00:29:45,680
have to take them at this value
when early in your offseason you

519
00:29:45,680 --> 00:29:46,960
may have got a little bit better
value.

520
00:29:46,960 --> 00:29:50,520
But now as steam is picking up,
the hype is picking up, you

521
00:29:50,520 --> 00:29:52,240
almost have no choice if you
want them.

522
00:29:52,280 --> 00:29:55,120
If if you're a huge Luther
burning guy, you're going to

523
00:29:55,120 --> 00:29:57,040
have to pony up and pick them
this high.

524
00:29:57,040 --> 00:29:58,520
It's just what it's just what it
is right now.

525
00:30:00,640 --> 00:30:03,440
I guess so.
And drafts like this don't help.

526
00:30:03,560 --> 00:30:05,240
They don't.
They don't help the ADP

527
00:30:05,280 --> 00:30:08,560
statistics.
I'll let you take round 4.

528
00:30:09,120 --> 00:30:12,240
All right, round four start out
with Nico Collins.

529
00:30:12,680 --> 00:30:15,680
Harold Fanning went at four O 2,
Jordan Love four O 3.

530
00:30:16,400 --> 00:30:21,080
Four O 4 was Lad Mcconkey, four
O 5 Kenneth Walker, four O 6

531
00:30:21,080 --> 00:30:25,200
Jonathan Taylor, four O 7 Chris
Olave, Four O 8 Breece Hall,

532
00:30:25,840 --> 00:30:30,840
Four O 9 Garrett Wilson, 410
Rashi Rice, 411 Christian

533
00:30:30,840 --> 00:30:34,320
McCaffrey and then 412 Carnell
Tate, rookie receiver.

534
00:30:36,240 --> 00:30:38,360
All right, well, I guess falls
on me.

535
00:30:38,360 --> 00:30:40,600
Which one stands out to me the
most?

536
00:30:41,360 --> 00:30:44,280
I I can't take Christian
McCaffrey here.

537
00:30:44,720 --> 00:30:47,160
I just can't.
I can't take him here at 411

538
00:30:47,880 --> 00:30:51,120
When when I look at players that
are a little bit after him, you

539
00:30:51,120 --> 00:30:53,360
have remember, this is Titan
premium.

540
00:30:53,360 --> 00:30:56,280
You still have Tucker craft on
the on the board.

541
00:30:56,280 --> 00:30:59,000
You still have Trayvion
Henderson.

542
00:31:01,280 --> 00:31:03,920
Let's take a look here.
I'll keep scrolling down into

543
00:31:03,920 --> 00:31:07,000
the fifth round.
Got Makai Lemon, You got Chase

544
00:31:07,000 --> 00:31:12,440
Brown.
That's, you know, when I said

545
00:31:12,440 --> 00:31:16,760
you don't want to take a guy,
you know, do we take a 2728 year

546
00:31:16,760 --> 00:31:19,200
old in the second round?
They will probably not if

547
00:31:19,200 --> 00:31:22,440
they're 28.
Do you take a guy who's going to

548
00:31:22,440 --> 00:31:26,480
be 30 in the fourth round?
Does that make sense?

549
00:31:26,800 --> 00:31:29,280
I I get it.
It's Christian McCaffrey.

550
00:31:29,840 --> 00:31:33,040
And he may do this and he may do
that, but at the end of the day,

551
00:31:33,040 --> 00:31:36,800
he's still 30 years old and he's
not built like Derrick Henry.

552
00:31:37,800 --> 00:31:43,280
You know, you can't teach size.
And I know that efficiency wise,

553
00:31:44,160 --> 00:31:47,160
Christian McCaffrey was actually
pretty poor last year.

554
00:31:47,960 --> 00:31:52,280
And you, I'm sure you've seen
some of the same statistics

555
00:31:52,280 --> 00:31:56,800
about him, but I mean, so much
of his value was propped up by

556
00:31:56,800 --> 00:32:01,840
his 102 receptions that I mean
that that'll help any player.

557
00:32:03,680 --> 00:32:07,760
But I just can't.
I can't justify in a dynasty

558
00:32:07,760 --> 00:32:11,200
league taking Christian
McCaffrey at at 411.

559
00:32:11,200 --> 00:32:14,520
Yeah, I know you think it's
going to supercharge your team,

560
00:32:14,760 --> 00:32:18,160
but for how long?
You know, I mean, unless you're

561
00:32:18,160 --> 00:32:21,920
all in and you're.
And once again, that US reading

562
00:32:21,920 --> 00:32:25,920
these players off, it doesn't
give the narrative of each team.

563
00:32:26,160 --> 00:32:31,080
It really, it truly doesn't that
that would take too much time.

564
00:32:31,960 --> 00:32:35,160
So we're really just looking at
this based on value and the

565
00:32:35,160 --> 00:32:39,360
picks.
I just don't like the value here

566
00:32:39,880 --> 00:32:42,600
for Christian McCaffrey.
It would be like drafting

567
00:32:42,840 --> 00:32:46,400
Matthew Stafford in the fourth
round and you say, well, he's

568
00:32:46,400 --> 00:32:48,400
going to be a top, but he's
going to be a top five

569
00:32:48,400 --> 00:32:50,000
quarterback.
He might be a top three

570
00:32:50,000 --> 00:32:51,840
quarterback.
I can draft him in the third

571
00:32:51,840 --> 00:32:54,080
round.
I don't care if he's only going

572
00:32:54,080 --> 00:32:56,240
to play a year or two.
But you wouldn't do that.

573
00:32:56,840 --> 00:32:59,200
So why are we doing that with
Christian McCaffrey?

574
00:33:00,480 --> 00:33:02,720
Yeah, yeah.
I mean the value.

575
00:33:02,760 --> 00:33:04,720
I don't love the value like you
said.

576
00:33:05,360 --> 00:33:07,680
I understand.
I understand why someone would

577
00:33:07,680 --> 00:33:10,920
want to do it just just for the
sake of this conversation.

578
00:33:10,920 --> 00:33:13,640
I think I did go through the
players that he picked.

579
00:33:14,280 --> 00:33:16,440
First round he picked Lamar
Jackson.

580
00:33:17,320 --> 00:33:19,520
In the second round he got
Ashton Gente.

581
00:33:19,840 --> 00:33:24,240
Third round he got Ted McMillan.
So I don't know, maybe his

582
00:33:24,240 --> 00:33:28,240
thinking here in Round 4 was to
possibly get a veteran,

583
00:33:28,320 --> 00:33:30,880
productive player to go along
with his young core.

584
00:33:31,680 --> 00:33:34,440
At the young core, he has a
receiver, running back.

585
00:33:34,440 --> 00:33:39,440
Maybe he just wants to insulate
that production and, and go for

586
00:33:39,480 --> 00:33:41,160
a run here.
I mean, that's a really good

587
00:33:41,160 --> 00:33:43,560
start production wise in the 1st
4 picks.

588
00:33:43,560 --> 00:33:46,560
He has an absolutely
tremendously productive team off

589
00:33:46,560 --> 00:33:49,800
the bat.
But it is a risky pick when you

590
00:33:49,800 --> 00:33:53,440
get into the fourth round.
I think the fifth round is more

591
00:33:53,440 --> 00:33:55,640
where he's been settling.
I mean, this is end of 4th.

592
00:33:55,640 --> 00:33:59,000
So it's not it's not out of the
norm, you know, I mean, it's not

593
00:33:59,000 --> 00:34:03,000
crazy to see him pick here.
I don't love the value that

594
00:34:03,000 --> 00:34:08,440
much, but yeah, I mean, Chris
McCaffrey, Chris McCaffrey, will

595
00:34:08,440 --> 00:34:11,679
he be the outlier Derrick Henry
type player where he can give

596
00:34:11,679 --> 00:34:15,400
you 3 more years at this level?
If he does, this is going to

597
00:34:15,400 --> 00:34:17,960
look like a really good pick
because because the team he has

598
00:34:17,960 --> 00:34:20,159
already, I mean, but this is
only four picks in.

599
00:34:20,159 --> 00:34:22,920
But the team he has, this could
this could be a strong player

600
00:34:22,920 --> 00:34:26,760
for his team right now.
But yeah, Chris McCaffrey, like

601
00:34:26,760 --> 00:34:31,480
you said, his his production
obviously was buoyed big time by

602
00:34:31,480 --> 00:34:34,920
the reception.
His efficiency was not good.

603
00:34:35,600 --> 00:34:38,199
And I saw a lot of games,
Christian McCaffrey, I saw a lot

604
00:34:38,199 --> 00:34:42,480
of him, a lot of his rushing
attempts and it just, it just

605
00:34:42,480 --> 00:34:45,600
didn't seem like he had that
burst, you know, like the, the

606
00:34:45,639 --> 00:34:49,080
the burst that he had early in
his career was very noticeable

607
00:34:50,120 --> 00:34:53,639
and the the long runs he would
break off absolutely ridiculous.

608
00:34:54,120 --> 00:34:55,440
He just didn't have that this
year.

609
00:34:55,440 --> 00:34:57,560
Whether it was at the blocking,
was it he just didn't.

610
00:34:57,880 --> 00:35:00,800
He doesn't have that initial
burst as he did earlier.

611
00:35:00,800 --> 00:35:02,160
I don't know.
I don't, I don't know.

612
00:35:02,160 --> 00:35:05,000
I wouldn't say that necessarily
because because he definitely

613
00:35:05,000 --> 00:35:06,880
hasn't when he's receiving the
ball.

614
00:35:07,680 --> 00:35:12,080
But yeah, that that's that's
he's a player that's definitely

615
00:35:12,080 --> 00:35:14,680
very much debated as far as
where he should go.

616
00:35:15,880 --> 00:35:19,560
Yeah, that, yeah, Valley wise,
it's valley wise.

617
00:35:19,560 --> 00:35:23,040
I would say right now just based
on his ADP, it's it's a wash.

618
00:35:23,040 --> 00:35:25,360
It's not like way higher than he
normally is.

619
00:35:25,360 --> 00:35:27,160
It's a it's a little bit, it's a
couple spots higher.

620
00:35:27,800 --> 00:35:30,720
Know what I'm seeing draft wise,
start up draft wise.

621
00:35:30,720 --> 00:35:33,960
But yeah, I mean, I just think
when you can insulate your

622
00:35:33,960 --> 00:35:36,320
production with a guy like that,
I think that it makes sense in

623
00:35:36,320 --> 00:35:40,480
that sense.
Yeah, I it's not a move I would

624
00:35:40,480 --> 00:35:41,560
make.
Yeah.

625
00:35:42,080 --> 00:35:45,360
Yeah, but looking how much time
we got left here, I got 30.

626
00:35:45,360 --> 00:35:48,440
We're at 35 minutes right now.
So you got about 25 minutes.

627
00:35:48,440 --> 00:35:52,800
Considering this was a 23 round
draft, I think realistically,

628
00:35:53,160 --> 00:35:55,720
you know, do you, do you really,
do any of the listeners care who

629
00:35:55,720 --> 00:35:58,000
people are who's getting picked
at round 19?

630
00:35:58,000 --> 00:36:01,400
I don't think so.
So I think we should set a goal.

631
00:36:01,400 --> 00:36:05,480
Let's try to get to round 15, go
through round 15.

632
00:36:05,480 --> 00:36:08,080
Because of the two drafts, the
one I was in with you and this

633
00:36:08,080 --> 00:36:13,840
one, seems to me once you get
around round 15, it's not as

634
00:36:13,840 --> 00:36:16,720
exciting.
Things start to slow down, but

635
00:36:16,720 --> 00:36:20,880
there's value to be had.
So with the next 10 rounds,

636
00:36:20,880 --> 00:36:23,560
let's just try to pick one
topic.

637
00:36:24,400 --> 00:36:27,200
If I read them off, you pick the
topic.

638
00:36:27,280 --> 00:36:29,160
If you read them off, I'll pick
the topic.

639
00:36:29,160 --> 00:36:31,280
And then that way, I think we
can get through the next 10

640
00:36:31,280 --> 00:36:34,440
rounds by the time we hit about
an hour.

641
00:36:36,560 --> 00:36:39,080
All right, so I'm going to read
here fifth round.

642
00:36:39,080 --> 00:36:40,760
And then you get to pick the
topic.

643
00:36:41,720 --> 00:36:43,800
And remember, too, this was a
draft.

644
00:36:44,440 --> 00:36:49,800
We're picking the rookies by
their name without a landing

645
00:36:49,800 --> 00:36:52,280
spot.
So that made some of the value,

646
00:36:52,520 --> 00:36:56,320
made it made it a little bit
more interesting at 5 O1.

647
00:36:56,320 --> 00:37:02,320
Fernando Mendoza AT5O2 You had
Dak Prescott at five O 3 Trayvon

648
00:37:02,320 --> 00:37:07,880
Henderson five O 4 Roma Dunes A
five O 5 Tucker Craft five O 6

649
00:37:07,880 --> 00:37:12,480
you have Kyle Pitts.
Five O 7 you have Makai Lemon,

650
00:37:12,480 --> 00:37:19,560
five O 8 Jared Goff, Five O 9
Chase Brown, 510 Cam Ward, 511

651
00:37:19,560 --> 00:37:24,040
you have Marvin Harrison Junior
and 512 you have Kyron Williams.

652
00:37:25,760 --> 00:37:26,920
Yeah.
So I'm just looking at this

653
00:37:26,920 --> 00:37:28,200
round.
I've noticed a couple things

654
00:37:28,200 --> 00:37:31,040
here.
What do you think in this round

655
00:37:31,120 --> 00:37:33,040
is The Who?
Who do you think in this round

656
00:37:33,040 --> 00:37:36,880
is the player that will will
return the most value when

657
00:37:36,880 --> 00:37:40,040
you're looking at your roster
this time next year?

658
00:37:42,440 --> 00:37:45,680
So who's going to be worth more
a year?

659
00:37:46,400 --> 00:37:48,960
Yeah, Relative to where he's
being picked currently right

660
00:37:48,960 --> 00:37:51,560
now, and based on, you know,
what we've seen so far in their

661
00:37:51,560 --> 00:37:55,040
career or if they're a rookie,
either way, who do you think

662
00:37:55,040 --> 00:37:59,240
will return the most value next
year if you're going to try to

663
00:37:59,240 --> 00:38:01,400
trade them or if you're just
going to keep rolling with them?

664
00:38:01,920 --> 00:38:06,120
OK, well, remember this is in
the universe where Trade McBride

665
00:38:06,120 --> 00:38:12,640
is the top 4 scorer.
So I I'm going to off the bat,

666
00:38:12,640 --> 00:38:18,880
I'm going to rule out Fernando
Mendoza and Dak Prescott and

667
00:38:19,320 --> 00:38:21,760
Roma Duante.
That's not a bet I would want to

668
00:38:21,760 --> 00:38:24,280
make that he's obviously going
to be the guy.

669
00:38:26,040 --> 00:38:28,480
Makai Lemon, we don't know where
he's going to be.

670
00:38:28,920 --> 00:38:31,440
Derek Goff, same thing.
Cam Ward?

671
00:38:31,640 --> 00:38:36,680
No, I, I guess I would have to
say between Kyron Williams,

672
00:38:38,320 --> 00:38:44,040
Trayvion Henderson, yeah, and
maybe Chase Brown.

673
00:38:44,160 --> 00:38:47,120
But I'm hearing Chase Brown
might not be safe in Cincinnati.

674
00:38:47,960 --> 00:38:51,800
But imagine Chase Brown has a
top five season similar to James

675
00:38:51,800 --> 00:38:55,360
Cook.
I would imagine he bumps up

676
00:38:55,360 --> 00:39:00,000
around maybe around and a half
instead of being picked at the

677
00:39:00,000 --> 00:39:04,440
five O 9.
I don't know if Kyron Williams

678
00:39:04,440 --> 00:39:11,480
is ever going to shake the, the,
the, I guess the narrative that

679
00:39:11,520 --> 00:39:16,800
he's his job is in danger.
I mean, when you see him and you

680
00:39:16,800 --> 00:39:20,120
see analysts say, they'll say he
doesn't really do anything

681
00:39:20,120 --> 00:39:21,520
special.
It's just a really good

682
00:39:21,520 --> 00:39:27,000
situation and he's good enough
to do the job how Sean McVay

683
00:39:27,000 --> 00:39:31,720
wants him to do it.
So I don't know.

684
00:39:31,720 --> 00:39:35,080
I guess I would put it between
those 3 running backs.

685
00:39:35,280 --> 00:39:38,960
I can't imagine Cam Ward I, I,
that's not a bet I want to make

686
00:39:38,960 --> 00:39:42,640
that Cam Ward's going to take
the step or Marvin Harrison

687
00:39:42,640 --> 00:39:44,560
Junior is going to turn it
around.

688
00:39:45,960 --> 00:39:48,320
Mackay Lemon, depends where he
goes.

689
00:39:50,200 --> 00:39:54,200
I mean, a guy like Tucker Craft,
he could certainly in this type

690
00:39:54,200 --> 00:39:57,200
of scoring format, he could bump
himself up around too.

691
00:39:57,200 --> 00:40:00,360
So he'd be the only non
quarterback or excuse me, non

692
00:40:00,360 --> 00:40:02,480
running back, I would put in
that conversation.

693
00:40:02,840 --> 00:40:06,040
How about you?
Yeah, yeah, I I think Tucker

694
00:40:06,040 --> 00:40:09,520
Craft was one that really stuck
out the most, especially in the

695
00:40:09,520 --> 00:40:12,160
scoring format that you
mentioned where the top 2 tight

696
00:40:12,160 --> 00:40:13,920
ends went.
And then we saw Tyler Warren as

697
00:40:13,920 --> 00:40:15,640
well going to 3rd with Colson
Loveland.

698
00:40:16,440 --> 00:40:21,000
So if Tucker Craft is has the
type of year that some of those

699
00:40:21,000 --> 00:40:24,280
guys had last year, you could
see him LV to the third round.

700
00:40:24,280 --> 00:40:28,840
I think he could be the biggest
jumper if you did this draft all

701
00:40:28,840 --> 00:40:31,960
over again next year, if Tucker
Craft has, you know, say a 95

702
00:40:31,960 --> 00:40:34,480
Cats for 1300 yard season, which
is very light.

703
00:40:34,480 --> 00:40:36,920
I mean, it's possible,
definitely going to happen, but

704
00:40:36,920 --> 00:40:39,520
if he has that, that type of
season, he's a third round pick

705
00:40:39,520 --> 00:40:42,160
in this format.
So yeah, Tucker Kraft for me

706
00:40:42,160 --> 00:40:47,080
would be the guy I think could
get could gain the most value of

707
00:40:47,080 --> 00:40:51,720
the players in the fifth round.
Sounds fair to me.

708
00:40:52,080 --> 00:40:54,240
I'll I'll let you handle round
6.

709
00:40:54,560 --> 00:40:59,720
All right, round 6, our favorite
player, Zay Flowers, Amari star.

710
00:40:59,720 --> 00:41:01,840
Hey, he was in the he was in
this draft as well.

711
00:41:01,840 --> 00:41:03,320
I don't.
I can't believe he didn't draft

712
00:41:03,320 --> 00:41:05,400
this guy.
I cannot believe.

713
00:41:05,400 --> 00:41:07,320
I can't believe it.
He was only a couple picks away.

714
00:41:07,320 --> 00:41:10,040
He picked Marvin Harrison Junior
over Zay Flowers.

715
00:41:10,600 --> 00:41:12,760
I'm very surprised.
Maybe he wanted to mix it up.

716
00:41:12,760 --> 00:41:16,720
But I I can't believe he didn't
pick the best floor behind the

717
00:41:16,720 --> 00:41:18,840
best floor in dynasty football.
He didn't pick it.

718
00:41:18,840 --> 00:41:20,920
I can't believe.
It he picked too exciting of a

719
00:41:20,920 --> 00:41:23,960
player.
All right, so Zay Flowers is 6

720
00:41:23,960 --> 00:41:28,720
O1 Quinch on drunken 6O26-O3 was
Jameson Williams six O 4.

721
00:41:28,720 --> 00:41:33,080
KC Concepcion six O 5 was a
techno weave special.

722
00:41:33,080 --> 00:41:37,600
Baker Mayfield six O 6, Saquon
Barkley, six O 7, A.J.

723
00:41:37,600 --> 00:41:44,200
Brown six O 8, CJ Stroud six O 9
was Daniel Jones 610 Travis ETN

724
00:41:44,200 --> 00:41:48,000
611 Devonta Smith.
And to round out of Mario Star

725
00:41:48,000 --> 00:41:50,960
ended the round six with Brian
Thomas Junior.

726
00:41:52,400 --> 00:41:55,840
Yeah, when I look at this list
here, I'm like, well, OK, you

727
00:41:55,840 --> 00:41:58,480
know, which one do I want to
talk about?

728
00:41:59,280 --> 00:42:04,880
It feels like overdrafting KC
Concepcion once again, who

729
00:42:04,880 --> 00:42:06,520
knows?
Depends on where he lands.

730
00:42:06,520 --> 00:42:11,080
But up until this point, we we
watch and consume as much

731
00:42:11,080 --> 00:42:16,120
fantasy media as anybody.
No, nobody is saying, you know,

732
00:42:16,160 --> 00:42:19,480
Oh, because no one, no one is
hyping up this rookie class.

733
00:42:20,760 --> 00:42:24,360
Very few people, you know, it's
the top three wide receivers.

734
00:42:24,360 --> 00:42:28,840
And then there's a tear break.
It felt to me, maybe this owner,

735
00:42:29,280 --> 00:42:32,320
this owner got kind of looped
into the I want a rookie.

736
00:42:32,960 --> 00:42:37,560
So they took a rookie before
safer players like Baker

737
00:42:37,560 --> 00:42:42,160
Mayfield or this is the type of
round I feel that Christian

738
00:42:42,160 --> 00:42:45,440
McCaffrey should go in because
it's the round Saquon Barkley

739
00:42:45,440 --> 00:42:46,520
went in.
If you're going to take

740
00:42:46,520 --> 00:42:50,960
Christian McCaffrey, why is
Saquon Barkley around 2 rounds

741
00:42:50,960 --> 00:42:55,360
later, he's younger and he's
going to give you the same.

742
00:42:55,760 --> 00:42:57,560
You're hoping for the same
outcome, right?

743
00:42:57,560 --> 00:43:01,200
You're hoping for that 2000 yard
season, you know, at the very

744
00:43:01,200 --> 00:43:05,520
top of the ceiling.
But to pick a player to talk

745
00:43:05,520 --> 00:43:09,920
about, well, I guess we talked
about tomorrow before and this

746
00:43:09,920 --> 00:43:13,240
was a tomorrow pick at the end
of the round.

747
00:43:13,720 --> 00:43:17,280
Brian Thomas, junior, Yeah, no,
I get it.

748
00:43:17,280 --> 00:43:20,520
He's not going to fall a whole
heck of a lot further.

749
00:43:22,320 --> 00:43:25,960
And if you hope he's he's going
to recover, you got a

750
00:43:26,320 --> 00:43:29,880
unfortunately, you have to
invest a pretty decent price

751
00:43:31,240 --> 00:43:35,640
that you know, this is this can
be what a future first goes for

752
00:43:35,760 --> 00:43:41,000
a future unknown first might get
you a six round pick, maybe

753
00:43:41,000 --> 00:43:45,520
something in the 5th.
So that's what he invested in

754
00:43:45,520 --> 00:43:48,240
Brian Thomas junior by picking
him here.

755
00:43:48,240 --> 00:43:50,840
And once again, it's all about
team construction.

756
00:43:50,840 --> 00:43:55,360
And I know he went with high
upside young players not looking

757
00:43:55,360 --> 00:43:58,480
to be competitive this year.
So this was a gamble pick.

758
00:43:58,920 --> 00:44:01,200
So it makes sense with that
mindset.

759
00:44:01,800 --> 00:44:05,480
But once again, is a good value
drafting.

760
00:44:06,360 --> 00:44:09,440
I mean, I guess if you put your
money into a volatile asset and

761
00:44:09,440 --> 00:44:12,120
you hope that it's going to
recover, it's just what is the

762
00:44:12,680 --> 00:44:16,160
how does the road to recovery
look for Brian Thomas junior?

763
00:44:17,400 --> 00:44:21,360
Well, I would imagine it's
Travis Hunter plays very little

764
00:44:21,360 --> 00:44:27,200
on offense.
They somehow we just forget

765
00:44:27,200 --> 00:44:29,640
about what happened last year.
I don't know.

766
00:44:29,640 --> 00:44:32,640
I guess that's the big question.
What happened to Brian Thomas

767
00:44:32,640 --> 00:44:35,640
junior last year that he was not
effective?

768
00:44:35,720 --> 00:44:37,800
I guess we can assume maybe it's
an injury.

769
00:44:38,320 --> 00:44:41,760
That's usually what it ends up
being or at least what the the

770
00:44:41,760 --> 00:44:44,040
team will tell us.
So they were playing injured

771
00:44:44,040 --> 00:44:48,040
last year.
And I've seen that we do

772
00:44:48,040 --> 00:44:51,640
penalize players for playing
injured versus just sitting out.

773
00:44:52,680 --> 00:44:56,600
You know, nobody faults Malik
Neighbors for not playing, but

774
00:44:57,040 --> 00:44:59,520
but if he went out there and
played poorly all year and

775
00:44:59,520 --> 00:45:03,600
they're like, well, you know, he
just tore his ACL and people

776
00:45:03,600 --> 00:45:07,320
would say, well, you know, we
would be more disappointed if

777
00:45:07,320 --> 00:45:09,520
you played injured than just not
playing at all.

778
00:45:11,160 --> 00:45:12,720
I don't know.
That's the only pick that kind

779
00:45:12,720 --> 00:45:14,720
of stood out to me in this
round.

780
00:45:15,560 --> 00:45:18,680
That and Saquon Barkley.
I like where Saquon Barkley was

781
00:45:18,680 --> 00:45:20,120
taken.
I think that's appropriate.

782
00:45:20,920 --> 00:45:23,440
Fourth round for CMC, not
appropriate.

783
00:45:23,880 --> 00:45:27,280
And if you need to do those
types of picks, they should have

784
00:45:27,280 --> 00:45:29,720
been flipped.
Barclay should have been in the

785
00:45:29,720 --> 00:45:31,880
4th and CMC should have been in
the 6th.

786
00:45:32,560 --> 00:45:36,080
Yeah, yeah, I mean when you look
at Barclay going to pick six O

787
00:45:36,080 --> 00:45:39,720
6, yeah, 100% they don't they
shouldn't be that far apart in

788
00:45:39,720 --> 00:45:42,480
any draft.
So you know incredible value

789
00:45:42,480 --> 00:45:46,760
forsake on Barclay and and
honestly, I think BTJ at pick

790
00:45:46,760 --> 00:45:49,040
612, I don't mind that value as
well.

791
00:45:49,480 --> 00:45:51,120
If you're banking on a bounce
back.

792
00:45:51,120 --> 00:45:55,680
I mean, his ADP currently is 44
and that's way lower than he was

793
00:45:56,080 --> 00:45:58,160
heading in the last year.
So obviously his ADP has

794
00:45:58,160 --> 00:45:59,640
dropped.
This is DLFADP.

795
00:45:59,640 --> 00:46:03,160
It has dropped a ton.
But I mean, we're talking about

796
00:46:03,160 --> 00:46:06,440
a guy who's still only 23 years
old.

797
00:46:06,440 --> 00:46:09,000
He's had very down year.
It was very confusing.

798
00:46:09,000 --> 00:46:12,000
Obviously it's it's confusing.
There's a lot of things that are

799
00:46:12,000 --> 00:46:15,600
going against them right now,
but I don't mind that value, You

800
00:46:15,600 --> 00:46:16,760
know, the end of the sixth
round.

801
00:46:16,760 --> 00:46:19,080
It's not, I don't feel like that
burned you.

802
00:46:19,200 --> 00:46:20,360
I don't really think I think it
does.

803
00:46:20,360 --> 00:46:22,880
There's one other pick, the pick
right before him.

804
00:46:23,360 --> 00:46:25,200
I really like Devonta Smith at
6:11.

805
00:46:25,200 --> 00:46:26,560
I mean, that's, that's
outstanding.

806
00:46:26,560 --> 00:46:28,960
That's outstanding value for
Devonta Smith, especially if

807
00:46:28,960 --> 00:46:30,600
A.J.
Brown is if he, if he gets

808
00:46:30,600 --> 00:46:33,160
traded, I mean Devonta Smith,
the number one receiver in

809
00:46:33,160 --> 00:46:36,200
Philadelphia that that's an
incredible value for him at 611.

810
00:46:36,200 --> 00:46:37,920
And he is a productive receiver
as it is.

811
00:46:38,720 --> 00:46:40,680
We don't have to wonder if he's
going to be productive.

812
00:46:40,680 --> 00:46:44,000
He he is already, but now he's
got a chance to be a little more

813
00:46:44,000 --> 00:46:48,040
consistent with his target
volume expected to go up if he

814
00:46:48,040 --> 00:46:51,040
is the number one.
So I I like Smith there at 6:11.

815
00:46:52,600 --> 00:46:54,760
Yeah, I like it too.
I like it too.

816
00:46:54,760 --> 00:46:58,400
And once A.J.
Brown gets traded, it'll be too

817
00:46:58,400 --> 00:47:01,040
late.
Then the cat's out of the bag.

818
00:47:01,040 --> 00:47:04,960
So if you think it's going to
happen and you don't, you're not

819
00:47:04,960 --> 00:47:06,760
scared off.
Because I think Devante Smith is

820
00:47:06,760 --> 00:47:12,560
going to be, what, 28 this year?
And you're OK with having 2-2

821
00:47:12,560 --> 00:47:15,000
years?
Maybe Yeah, maybe it's 3.

822
00:47:16,840 --> 00:47:19,880
You're you're OK with that and
that you know he's going to get

823
00:47:19,880 --> 00:47:23,640
phased out for the the new new
player, whoever that is at that

824
00:47:23,640 --> 00:47:26,560
time.
If you're OK with that two year

825
00:47:26,560 --> 00:47:30,040
window and you feel like you
want to have a an elite wide

826
00:47:30,040 --> 00:47:34,640
receiver one on on their team in
a good offense.

827
00:47:35,440 --> 00:47:37,800
It it certainly isn't.
You know who else you going to

828
00:47:37,800 --> 00:47:41,040
get in the seventh round or
excuse me, the the late 6th

829
00:47:41,040 --> 00:47:47,000
round, but moving on to the
seventh round, we got at seven O

830
00:47:47,000 --> 00:47:49,240
1.
I got Bucky Irving seven O 2,

831
00:47:49,240 --> 00:47:54,880
Sam Laporta seven O 3, Jordan
Tyson seven O 4, Javonte

832
00:47:54,880 --> 00:48:01,400
Williams, seven O 5 Sam Darnold
seven O 6 Kyler Murray, seven O

833
00:48:01,400 --> 00:48:07,560
7 T Higgins seven O 8 You got
Kenyan Siddique, seven O 9 Tyler

834
00:48:07,560 --> 00:48:09,960
Shuck.
So I guess we had a run on

835
00:48:09,960 --> 00:48:15,760
quarterbacks this round. 7:10
you got Jalen Warren, or excuse

836
00:48:15,760 --> 00:48:21,720
me, Jalen Waddle, 711 got Malik
Willis and 7:12 you have Josh

837
00:48:21,720 --> 00:48:23,360
Jacobs.
What sticks out to you?

838
00:48:23,360 --> 00:48:25,200
Who do you want to talk about in
Round 7?

839
00:48:25,760 --> 00:48:28,000
I mean, I, it's really what like
you just mentioned, it's really

840
00:48:28,000 --> 00:48:30,720
the run on quarterbacks that I
see here and that's out of

841
00:48:30,720 --> 00:48:32,320
necessity.
I think you're going to see that

842
00:48:32,320 --> 00:48:36,280
sometimes in these leagues.
But other than that, I, I think

843
00:48:36,280 --> 00:48:40,200
I would, I think the one guy
that sticks out to the most to

844
00:48:40,200 --> 00:48:44,560
me, probably, I mean, probably T
Higgins, T Higgins at seven O 7.

845
00:48:44,560 --> 00:48:48,080
I think as far as a guy that's
he's not the most exciting

846
00:48:48,080 --> 00:48:51,480
player to have on your team, but
he's also as a wide receiver 2

847
00:48:51,480 --> 00:48:54,640
or I'm assuming this team, it's
maybe as wide receiver three.

848
00:48:55,440 --> 00:48:57,960
I mean, that's not a bad pick.
That's not a pick at in the in

849
00:48:57,960 --> 00:49:01,760
round, say the middle round 7A
guy who's going to get targets.

850
00:49:01,760 --> 00:49:03,520
He's he's playing alongside
Jamar Chase.

851
00:49:03,520 --> 00:49:06,760
He he has an elite quarterback
on his team looking right here.

852
00:49:06,760 --> 00:49:10,320
I know he's not young anymore.
He's he he just turned 27.

853
00:49:10,320 --> 00:49:12,440
So he's entered his age 27
season.

854
00:49:12,440 --> 00:49:16,280
So that's not terrible.
Obviously he's not the model of

855
00:49:16,280 --> 00:49:21,000
health, but when he's on the
field round seven pick, it's

856
00:49:21,000 --> 00:49:23,320
it's not it's not a bad pick.
I don't think that's a bad

857
00:49:23,560 --> 00:49:27,320
selection there.
I think T Higgins scores return

858
00:49:27,320 --> 00:49:29,360
to value there in the middle of
round seven.

859
00:49:29,880 --> 00:49:32,640
Definitely not where I see him
in some AD.

860
00:49:32,640 --> 00:49:35,720
PS I wouldn't drive him around
four or five, you know, which is

861
00:49:35,720 --> 00:49:37,680
where I've seen earlier in the
off season.

862
00:49:37,680 --> 00:49:40,000
But round seven, yeah, that's
that's a safe spot for him.

863
00:49:42,320 --> 00:49:46,800
Yeah, I, I think that's true.
I don't have any, any reason to

864
00:49:46,800 --> 00:49:51,480
contest that.
And as FYI, we got about 10

865
00:49:51,480 --> 00:49:54,920
minutes if we're going to hit
our, our one hour deadline for

866
00:49:54,920 --> 00:49:58,120
the show where we try to keep it
within an hour to make it an

867
00:49:58,120 --> 00:50:01,360
easy listen.
So I'm not sure if we're going

868
00:50:01,360 --> 00:50:04,160
to get to round 15, but we're
going to get through some of the

869
00:50:04,240 --> 00:50:06,920
at least the 1st 10 rounds.
Those are your starters, right?

870
00:50:06,920 --> 00:50:10,520
This is a start 10 league.
I think, yeah, the goal should

871
00:50:10,520 --> 00:50:12,840
be to get through round 10,
which is definitely, definitely

872
00:50:12,840 --> 00:50:15,520
possible here.
So I'll just start round eight.

873
00:50:15,680 --> 00:50:20,600
I'll start round 8 here.
Eight O 1 Arande Gatson 8O2 is

874
00:50:20,600 --> 00:50:23,560
Omar Cooper Junior.
Eight O 3 Cam Scatabo.

875
00:50:23,960 --> 00:50:28,320
Eight O 4 was Jake Ferguson,
Eight O 5 Bryce Young eight O 6

876
00:50:28,320 --> 00:50:32,840
Denzel Boston eight O 7 Derrick
Henry Eight O 8 Alec Pierce

877
00:50:33,040 --> 00:50:37,680
Eight O 9 Wandale Robinson 810
DJ Moore 811 Zach Charbonnet,

878
00:50:38,120 --> 00:50:43,520
812 Jordan Addison.
So yeah, I'm going to ask you a

879
00:50:43,520 --> 00:50:47,680
quick question for this round.
What in your opinion in this

880
00:50:47,680 --> 00:50:52,440
round, which player, which
player could be impacted by the

881
00:50:52,440 --> 00:50:56,240
draft the most in this round and
how will it affect their dynasty

882
00:50:56,240 --> 00:50:58,400
value?
I'm not going to let you pick

883
00:50:58,400 --> 00:50:59,720
Cam Scatter, but you got to pick
someone.

884
00:51:00,280 --> 00:51:02,560
Oh no.
You're yeah, I'm not letting you

885
00:51:02,560 --> 00:51:03,880
pick them.
That's too easy.

886
00:51:03,880 --> 00:51:06,120
You got to pick someone else
because there are, there are

887
00:51:06,120 --> 00:51:09,520
there are a couple players in
this track in this round that

888
00:51:09,520 --> 00:51:11,320
could be impacted and it could
be a rookie too.

889
00:51:11,320 --> 00:51:13,520
You could also pick a rookie.
Oh, OK.

890
00:51:13,520 --> 00:51:15,920
I thought it was going to be
like the the dynasty advice

891
00:51:15,920 --> 00:51:20,400
where no, yes, this week you do
want to start Bijon Robinson.

892
00:51:20,880 --> 00:51:23,480
You know, if you have of you got
to start of this week, Yeah.

893
00:51:23,840 --> 00:51:26,240
You're not you're not getting
the softball cams guy out of a

894
00:51:26,240 --> 00:51:26,920
question.
No way.

895
00:51:26,920 --> 00:51:28,840
Everyone's heard that question
millions of times.

896
00:51:28,840 --> 00:51:32,200
Ready by now?
OK, who's going to be most

897
00:51:32,200 --> 00:51:35,480
impacted by the draft?
And it's not Cam Skataboo.

898
00:51:36,240 --> 00:51:41,520
And Jordan loves Jordan, love
eclipsing him and making it what

899
00:51:41,520 --> 00:51:44,080
I heard they call him.
He's the new Tyrone Tracy.

900
00:51:44,480 --> 00:51:47,560
That's exactly what he would be.
He'd be the new Tyrone Tracy on

901
00:51:47,560 --> 00:51:51,680
the same team.
Yeah, I guess I would say the

902
00:51:51,680 --> 00:51:54,760
only player that has a kind of a
prominent role or we're

903
00:51:54,760 --> 00:51:58,960
imagining A prominent role or
when you're drafting them, which

904
00:51:58,960 --> 00:52:03,480
is still relatively high.
It's got to be Zach Charbonnet,

905
00:52:04,520 --> 00:52:07,200
you know, NFL.
It's what have you done for me

906
00:52:07,200 --> 00:52:10,280
lately?
And we know they're going to

907
00:52:10,280 --> 00:52:14,080
draft someone.
They're going to draft someone

908
00:52:14,680 --> 00:52:21,240
to to fill in for the departure
of Kenneth Walker and that

909
00:52:21,240 --> 00:52:25,680
carbonate coming off an injury.
And that's imagining somehow he

910
00:52:25,680 --> 00:52:27,760
starts the year.
I heard that he's not going to

911
00:52:27,760 --> 00:52:30,200
start the year.
They're hoping he comes back

912
00:52:30,200 --> 00:52:35,600
sometime during the year.
This is how players lose their

913
00:52:35,600 --> 00:52:41,400
jobs and all the sudden say he
comes back Week 7 and it takes

914
00:52:41,400 --> 00:52:47,120
him till Week 11 before he's in
game shape and they go out and

915
00:52:47,120 --> 00:52:49,400
they get Mike Washington.
I don't know, I'm just picking a

916
00:52:49,400 --> 00:52:55,000
random, random guy and all of a
sudden he just ignites in that

917
00:52:55,000 --> 00:53:00,240
offense.
Zach Charbonnet's value goes in

918
00:53:00,240 --> 00:53:03,680
the gutter and Seattle goes,
we're going to go with what's

919
00:53:03,680 --> 00:53:05,160
working.
We're not going to rush the

920
00:53:05,160 --> 00:53:07,280
injured player back.
We don't want him to be like

921
00:53:07,560 --> 00:53:09,560
Jonathan Brooks and get injured
again.

922
00:53:11,240 --> 00:53:15,000
That's the player I would say
that would be most impacted

923
00:53:16,120 --> 00:53:21,680
potentially by the draft.
Yeah, I, I, I'm comfortable with

924
00:53:21,680 --> 00:53:24,120
that, that people think right
now I'm just going to hang on to

925
00:53:24,120 --> 00:53:26,520
Zach Jarbonnet.
It'll be cool.

926
00:53:27,400 --> 00:53:30,280
It his job is safe.
It'll be like the injury didn't

927
00:53:30,280 --> 00:53:33,000
happen.
No, you can have a rookie come

928
00:53:33,000 --> 00:53:35,400
in and play like Bucky Irvin did
a couple years ago.

929
00:53:36,120 --> 00:53:38,120
And all of a sudden your, your,
your old hat.

930
00:53:38,120 --> 00:53:42,840
Nobody remembers you.
And the coach wants to win and

931
00:53:42,840 --> 00:53:46,520
the team wants to win and the
and and you're put on the back

932
00:53:46,520 --> 00:53:50,320
burner and you have to go
somewhere else to get your shot.

933
00:53:50,320 --> 00:53:52,760
Kind of like sort of like
Kenneth Walker did.

934
00:53:52,760 --> 00:53:56,560
Not that he had major injuries,
but he has to go somewhere else

935
00:53:56,560 --> 00:53:59,560
to get that lead role or he's
the guy.

936
00:54:00,520 --> 00:54:03,720
And now Zach Charbonnet had a,
you know, he has the future

937
00:54:03,720 --> 00:54:05,720
right in front of him and
someone else can come in and

938
00:54:05,720 --> 00:54:07,480
shut the door.
I don't know.

939
00:54:07,480 --> 00:54:10,240
That's who I'd pick.
Yeah, yeah, that's one of the

940
00:54:10,240 --> 00:54:12,280
names right there that stuck out
the most.

941
00:54:12,840 --> 00:54:15,400
I think like you said, it's all
about the draft coming up in

942
00:54:15,400 --> 00:54:17,560
Seattle being where they're
where they are.

943
00:54:17,880 --> 00:54:20,040
Obviously the the last pick in
the first round.

944
00:54:20,600 --> 00:54:22,840
It could be very enticing for
them to pick one of those

945
00:54:22,840 --> 00:54:24,440
running backs.
It could be very enticing,

946
00:54:24,440 --> 00:54:27,640
especially when you have a team
that already has a contending

947
00:54:27,640 --> 00:54:31,280
roster defending Super Bowl
champs And if you don't want to

948
00:54:31,280 --> 00:54:34,640
have an early season lack in
production at the running back

949
00:54:34,640 --> 00:54:38,800
position and you want to draft a
say, engineering price, make him

950
00:54:38,800 --> 00:54:41,400
a first round pick.
That's going to be tough.

951
00:54:41,400 --> 00:54:44,440
That's going to make a lot of
people concerned for Zach

952
00:54:44,440 --> 00:54:47,480
Charbonnay.
Not that he can't have any value

953
00:54:47,480 --> 00:54:49,920
on the Seahawks.
It just as far as him being a

954
00:54:49,920 --> 00:54:53,360
guy that just takes over that
that might be tough if a if a

955
00:54:53,360 --> 00:54:54,960
highly drafted rookies there
too.

956
00:54:57,560 --> 00:55:00,600
Yep, I I agree.
I agree.

957
00:55:01,040 --> 00:55:05,840
Well, we're moving into Round 9,
and I already have my question

958
00:55:05,840 --> 00:55:08,720
ready for you.
And maybe it's a little bit

959
00:55:08,720 --> 00:55:11,640
similar to the one you just
asked me, but round 9, starting

960
00:55:11,640 --> 00:55:16,960
out at 9, O1 got Parker
Washington, nine O 2 Christian

961
00:55:16,960 --> 00:55:22,960
Watson, nine O 3 Bashel Tooten 9
O 4 DeAndre Swift nine O 5 Jaden

962
00:55:22,960 --> 00:55:27,520
Higgins nine O 6.
Jadarian Price could be that guy

963
00:55:27,520 --> 00:55:31,480
that goes to Seattle and shuts
the door on Charbonnay's dreams.

964
00:55:33,320 --> 00:55:38,040
Nine O 7 you have Matthew
Stafford, nine O 8 Isaiah Likely

965
00:55:38,040 --> 00:55:43,160
nine O 9 Ricky Pearsall, 910.
This guy should have been the

966
00:55:43,160 --> 00:55:47,400
11.
RJ Harvey, we, we've talked

967
00:55:47,400 --> 00:55:51,120
about enough about him.
There's no way he, he doesn't do

968
00:55:51,120 --> 00:55:54,560
better than the, the mockery
we've thrown his way.

969
00:55:54,760 --> 00:55:58,440
You know, he's an NFL player.
So he he's he's a lot better

970
00:55:58,440 --> 00:56:04,400
than I would ever have been in
the NFL. 911 got Michael Wilson

971
00:56:04,640 --> 00:56:09,920
and 912 DK Metcalf.
The one thing that stood out to

972
00:56:09,920 --> 00:56:12,680
me for this round is a lot of
question marks.

973
00:56:13,320 --> 00:56:16,920
I was like, why is Parker
Washington being drafted here?

974
00:56:16,920 --> 00:56:20,400
And do I really believe in
Michael Wilson?

975
00:56:20,640 --> 00:56:23,520
And was he just a product of
having no one else to throw to

976
00:56:23,520 --> 00:56:25,040
and they were playing from
behind?

977
00:56:26,680 --> 00:56:28,760
And is Christian Watson for
real?

978
00:56:29,720 --> 00:56:35,560
But the question for you is, in
round nine, who is the most, I

979
00:56:35,560 --> 00:56:43,720
guess overrated player of this
round who does not deserve to be

980
00:56:44,280 --> 00:56:48,520
a pick in this round?
Man wow round.

981
00:56:48,520 --> 00:56:50,240
Now let's see what's overrated
player.

982
00:56:51,640 --> 00:56:57,120
I'm a hard time following this
guy overrated just because he's

983
00:56:57,160 --> 00:56:59,600
he's not.
I mean, he's a defending MVP.

984
00:56:59,600 --> 00:57:01,120
He's the reigning MVP of the
league.

985
00:57:01,720 --> 00:57:05,040
But I think in a super flex
dynasty draft Matthew Stafford

986
00:57:05,040 --> 00:57:09,280
around 9.
I, I think, man, I understand.

987
00:57:09,280 --> 00:57:12,880
I, I do understand the the logic
behind it, the production you're

988
00:57:12,880 --> 00:57:16,000
going to get right away.
But we have no idea.

989
00:57:16,000 --> 00:57:18,440
They could they could draft,
they could draft the

990
00:57:18,440 --> 00:57:21,880
quarterback, you know, coming up
Thursday and he could be the guy

991
00:57:21,880 --> 00:57:24,120
that's ready to take over and we
can find out Stafford's playing

992
00:57:24,120 --> 00:57:28,640
his last year, you know, so that
that's a risk you're taking.

993
00:57:28,640 --> 00:57:30,880
It's a risk you're going to take
if you're a contending team.

994
00:57:30,880 --> 00:57:35,080
So I would imagine this team at
at Pico by nine O 7 is planning

995
00:57:35,080 --> 00:57:37,880
to contend.
So that I understand.

996
00:57:38,040 --> 00:57:41,840
I just think there's certain
players that you can you can

997
00:57:41,840 --> 00:57:45,200
have over him here that you're
going to feel better and you

998
00:57:45,200 --> 00:57:46,880
could possibly get him a little
later in the drive.

999
00:57:47,520 --> 00:57:49,320
But again, every league's
different.

1000
00:57:49,440 --> 00:57:50,600
I've seen him go higher than
this.

1001
00:57:50,840 --> 00:57:52,600
I've seen him go higher, I've
seen him go lower.

1002
00:57:52,600 --> 00:57:54,440
It it just depends.
But I'd say Matthew Stanford,

1003
00:57:54,840 --> 00:57:58,680
he's not overrated as a player,
but in this specific spot, I

1004
00:57:58,680 --> 00:58:02,920
think, yeah, I, I wouldn't feel,
I wouldn't feel really

1005
00:58:02,920 --> 00:58:06,000
comfortable taking him on my
dynasty roster not knowing, you

1006
00:58:06,000 --> 00:58:07,240
know, what's going to happen
after this year.

1007
00:58:08,200 --> 00:58:11,120
Yeah, and and then and to
clarify, that is what I meant by

1008
00:58:11,120 --> 00:58:15,920
overrated that this is the
rating that OK, Matthew

1009
00:58:15,920 --> 00:58:18,560
Stafford, he's worth the nine O
7 in a startup.

1010
00:58:19,760 --> 00:58:23,400
Not not that in general or
through outside ranking sources,

1011
00:58:23,400 --> 00:58:26,080
just this ranking source from
this draft.

1012
00:58:26,080 --> 00:58:30,080
This is their, their ranking.
Who's the most overrated, who

1013
00:58:30,080 --> 00:58:32,120
shouldn't, who didn't deserve
that spot?

1014
00:58:33,280 --> 00:58:36,320
I, you know, I, that's exactly
how I feel about Matthew

1015
00:58:36,320 --> 00:58:38,960
Stafford mentioned that earlier.
You're going to take Matthew

1016
00:58:38,960 --> 00:58:42,960
Stafford at nine O 7.
Well, why not take him at a 411

1017
00:58:42,960 --> 00:58:44,840
like you did Christian
McCaffrey?

1018
00:58:45,640 --> 00:58:51,800
It, it's the same type of logic.
And if it doesn't apply at 4:11,

1019
00:58:51,800 --> 00:58:56,120
it shouldn't apply at nine O 7
because in this type of scoring

1020
00:58:56,120 --> 00:59:02,760
format, it's made to be a
balanced format that you see

1021
00:59:02,760 --> 00:59:07,000
quarterbacks, running backs,
tight ends, wide receivers, when

1022
00:59:07,000 --> 00:59:09,600
you're the top of your position,
you're going to all somewhat

1023
00:59:09,600 --> 00:59:12,320
score relative to the other
players.

1024
00:59:14,800 --> 00:59:19,120
And I, I just, I, I don't have a
problem with going after Matthew

1025
00:59:19,120 --> 00:59:26,440
Stafford, but when you take what
should be a good draft strategy,

1026
00:59:26,640 --> 00:59:28,880
oh, I'm going to get a
quarterback that's a veteran

1027
00:59:28,880 --> 00:59:33,880
later and then you turn it into,
I'm going to prioritize getting

1028
00:59:33,880 --> 00:59:38,800
Matthew Stafford for one year.
I don't like that.

1029
00:59:39,360 --> 00:59:43,960
I don't like that sometimes your
plan it, it falls apart and you

1030
00:59:43,960 --> 00:59:46,640
have to pivot.
This seemed like they were

1031
00:59:46,640 --> 00:59:51,320
targeting Matthew Stafford
specifically here for that

1032
00:59:51,320 --> 00:59:54,920
reason.
And, you know, I guess I would

1033
00:59:54,920 --> 00:59:57,480
have rather just you just pick a
quarterback a little bit sooner

1034
00:59:57,920 --> 01:00:00,480
and if someone like Matthew
Stafford falls to you at a

1035
01:00:00,480 --> 01:00:02,760
better spot, you're OK with
that.

1036
01:00:04,120 --> 01:00:05,000
Yeah.
Yeah.

1037
01:00:05,000 --> 01:00:07,520
I mean, I'm just taking a quick
peek right now at the DLFADP.

1038
01:00:07,520 --> 01:00:11,760
He's at 192.
So obviously you're not going to

1039
01:00:11,760 --> 01:00:14,120
get him at 192 in a lot of
drafts.

1040
01:00:14,120 --> 01:00:16,840
We know teams are going to draft
him higher just because he is

1041
01:00:16,880 --> 01:00:19,640
very productive.
But man, I just, I just think

1042
01:00:19,640 --> 01:00:23,000
you can.
If the draft went based on where

1043
01:00:23,000 --> 01:00:25,560
their true values are at, yeah,
you're not going to have to take

1044
01:00:25,560 --> 01:00:28,400
them around or not.
No, no.

1045
01:00:28,480 --> 01:00:31,280
Well, I guess you get to close
this out here for round 10.

1046
01:00:33,000 --> 01:00:36,280
All right, round 10 here we will
close this out.

1047
01:00:36,400 --> 01:00:43,040
Pick ten O 1 was common on Guy
Yeah 10 O2 Chick a Conquel 10 O3

1048
01:00:43,120 --> 01:00:48,080
George Kittle ten O 4 Bretton
Strange ten O 5 Dalton Kincaid.

1049
01:00:48,080 --> 01:00:50,200
So there we go we got four
straight tight ends picked here

1050
01:00:50,200 --> 01:00:54,600
around 10:10 O 6 David
Montgomery ten O 7 Eli Stowers

1051
01:00:54,600 --> 01:01:01,120
that are tight end ten O 8 Rico
Dowdle 10O9AJ Barner, 10/10 Josh

1052
01:01:01,120 --> 01:01:05,600
Downs, 1011 Xavier Worthy and
1012 Matthew Gold.

1053
01:01:05,760 --> 01:01:12,240
So while going through this list
of players, my question would be

1054
01:01:13,400 --> 01:01:16,120
what?
What what player do you think

1055
01:01:16,120 --> 01:01:21,320
here in this round?
What players do you think have

1056
01:01:21,320 --> 01:01:24,800
the chance to be the most
productive this year on their

1057
01:01:24,800 --> 01:01:28,680
team?
Most productive just one year.

1058
01:01:28,880 --> 01:01:31,280
Yeah, one year, because you
think about round 10 players,

1059
01:01:31,280 --> 01:01:33,560
you're starting to get to the
range where a lot of them may be

1060
01:01:33,560 --> 01:01:36,560
like a handcuff running back or
you know, maybe you may get like

1061
01:01:36,560 --> 01:01:40,720
a upside player who hasn't done
anything yet but has upside, or

1062
01:01:40,720 --> 01:01:42,800
you might get a productive
veteran type player.

1063
01:01:42,800 --> 01:01:47,000
Who do you think in this round
10 you're entering 2026 season?

1064
01:01:47,000 --> 01:01:49,520
Who are you plugging into your
lineup with the most confidence?

1065
01:01:51,080 --> 01:01:56,440
OK, well, I I would say it comes
down to three players and I'll

1066
01:01:56,600 --> 01:01:59,520
just kind of be doing a
processing it out loud here.

1067
01:02:00,120 --> 01:02:03,400
Now George Kittle, I've heard
that it's possible he's he's

1068
01:02:03,400 --> 01:02:07,760
back or maybe just misses a few
games to start the year and in

1069
01:02:07,760 --> 01:02:11,440
this type of format to get a
George Kittle in the tenth

1070
01:02:11,440 --> 01:02:13,320
round, that's a that's a decent
pick.

1071
01:02:13,960 --> 01:02:17,320
And you know, Brock Purdy is
tremendous value.

1072
01:02:17,320 --> 01:02:23,600
He's a good producer.
So I'm liking George Kittle, but

1073
01:02:24,360 --> 01:02:29,280
David Montgomery as well.
I'm assuming Houston, you know,

1074
01:02:29,400 --> 01:02:31,120
Well, they're not.
They're not getting Jeremiah

1075
01:02:31,120 --> 01:02:33,520
Love, so it doesn't really
matter who else they pick up.

1076
01:02:34,160 --> 01:02:37,800
But they could be a team to go
after a Jadarian Price or one of

1077
01:02:37,800 --> 01:02:40,240
the other running backs that's
out there.

1078
01:02:42,280 --> 01:02:46,120
But assuming David Montgomery,
he's not too old, he's shown to

1079
01:02:46,120 --> 01:02:49,080
be decent.
It's all a question of that

1080
01:02:49,080 --> 01:02:54,200
Houston offensive line.
He could certainly put up some

1081
01:02:54,200 --> 01:02:58,000
good numbers.
And Rico Dowdle, I mean, he just

1082
01:02:58,000 --> 01:03:00,320
had some explosive games last
year.

1083
01:03:00,360 --> 01:03:03,960
And I'm not worried about Jalen
Warren.

1084
01:03:03,960 --> 01:03:07,200
I am worried if Aaron Rodgers
isn't there and all of a sudden

1085
01:03:07,200 --> 01:03:11,400
it's will Howard or they just
throw Ty Simpson to the wolves

1086
01:03:11,400 --> 01:03:13,200
because they can't get anybody
else.

1087
01:03:13,720 --> 01:03:17,360
And then they say, well, OK, you
know, let's let's hope the rest

1088
01:03:17,360 --> 01:03:19,040
of the team just somehow makes
it work.

1089
01:03:21,040 --> 01:03:26,840
But breaking it down that way,
David Montgomery, Rico Dowdell,

1090
01:03:28,200 --> 01:03:30,960
I guess the safest would be
David Montgomery.

1091
01:03:31,360 --> 01:03:32,840
There we go.
I don't have to worry about

1092
01:03:32,840 --> 01:03:35,680
injury and I don't have to worry
about quarterback situation.

1093
01:03:35,680 --> 01:03:39,280
So on April 20th, give me David
Montgomery.

1094
01:03:39,280 --> 01:03:45,880
He's the safest player I could
put into my lineup as an RB2 and

1095
01:03:45,880 --> 01:03:50,360
feel feel OK about that.
Anecdotally, I you know, you and

1096
01:03:50,360 --> 01:03:53,520
I have talked behind the scenes.
I have the 11 in a certain

1097
01:03:53,520 --> 01:03:57,720
league and I've been shopping it
and I received a bad trade

1098
01:03:57,720 --> 01:04:01,560
offer.
The initial offer was the 11.

1099
01:04:01,560 --> 01:04:05,640
They want me to give the 11 for
David Montgomery and the one O 9

1100
01:04:06,280 --> 01:04:10,040
and I looked at that and I said,
come on, I kind of loud.

1101
01:04:10,040 --> 01:04:14,120
I'm like, come on, you know.
And the thing was the counters,

1102
01:04:14,120 --> 01:04:16,280
the offers did get.
They got better.

1103
01:04:16,560 --> 01:04:18,360
They got better.
But I'm like we're we're really

1104
01:04:18,360 --> 01:04:21,480
starting on the the basement
level here.

1105
01:04:21,480 --> 01:04:24,160
We're we're on the in the garden
level apartment.

1106
01:04:24,160 --> 01:04:29,120
It's even like somewhat sub stub
ground floor here.

1107
01:04:31,360 --> 01:04:34,000
But yeah, I'll go.
I'll go with David Montgomery.

1108
01:04:34,520 --> 01:04:36,720
Yeah, that that's a, that's a
good offer right there.

1109
01:04:37,200 --> 01:04:39,960
We we always talk about, you
know, starting, you know, you

1110
01:04:39,960 --> 01:04:42,480
might want to start with a just
an introductory offer, but you

1111
01:04:42,480 --> 01:04:44,720
definitely want to make sure
you're on the same planet, you

1112
01:04:44,720 --> 01:04:47,600
know that that's a good start.
You know, it's, but yeah, I

1113
01:04:47,600 --> 01:04:50,560
mean, Dave Montgomery there as
far as production, I think we're

1114
01:04:50,560 --> 01:04:53,200
going to, we're going to see I,
I think he's the safest bet

1115
01:04:53,360 --> 01:04:55,280
production wise.
He's he's got the lead role.

1116
01:04:55,640 --> 01:04:57,280
There's no question the the most
upside.

1117
01:04:57,280 --> 01:04:59,720
Obviously George Kittle, if he's
healthy, you know, there's no

1118
01:04:59,720 --> 01:05:02,400
question about it.
But yeah, Dave Montgomery round

1119
01:05:02,400 --> 01:05:05,680
10, you get yourself, I mean,
that could be your 4th or 5th

1120
01:05:05,680 --> 01:05:07,880
running back at that point.
That's not that's not bad at

1121
01:05:08,000 --> 01:05:10,400
all.
Absolutely.

1122
01:05:10,400 --> 01:05:15,000
Well, that was that was our, I
guess that rounds out the 1st 10

1123
01:05:15,000 --> 01:05:17,760
rounds.
So if you're curious, if you got

1124
01:05:17,760 --> 01:05:20,800
a start up coming up where your
player might go, you can listen

1125
01:05:20,800 --> 01:05:24,280
to listen to this show, rewind
it, see where your player ended

1126
01:05:24,280 --> 01:05:27,240
up.
And yeah, definitely

1127
01:05:27,600 --> 01:05:31,760
anecdotally, at least in my
opinion, 10 to 15 you get you

1128
01:05:31,760 --> 01:05:36,960
get some decent value in there,
some some nice handcuffs, some

1129
01:05:36,960 --> 01:05:39,480
wide receiver, 2 wide receiver,
three options.

1130
01:05:40,040 --> 01:05:45,280
But after round about round 15
in this format, this is not IDP.

1131
01:05:46,640 --> 01:05:50,360
Just start 10 offensive players
already talked about that super

1132
01:05:50,360 --> 01:05:55,040
flex Titan Premium.
After about round 15, it kind of

1133
01:05:55,040 --> 01:05:59,320
starts to matter a lot less.
But yeah, it's, it was fun this

1134
01:05:59,320 --> 01:06:03,400
week and later on this week we
got the draft and next week

1135
01:06:03,400 --> 01:06:08,400
we'll do a a rookie draft recap
and and our reactions to that.

1136
01:06:08,400 --> 01:06:10,640
I'm excited.
I'm sure you are too as as most

1137
01:06:10,760 --> 01:06:12,440
most of the fantasy community
is.

1138
01:06:13,280 --> 01:06:15,960
Yeah, 100%.
I mean, NFL draft, that's that's

1139
01:06:15,960 --> 01:06:18,840
a big day.
That's a big day in NFL terms.

1140
01:06:18,840 --> 01:06:21,080
That's a big day in dynasty
fantasy football terms.

1141
01:06:21,080 --> 01:06:23,720
That's it's a it's fun.
It's, it's exciting.

1142
01:06:24,480 --> 01:06:25,640
I know I'm looking forward to
it.

1143
01:06:25,640 --> 01:06:29,280
I know a lot of people that are,
you know, dynasty fans, football

1144
01:06:29,280 --> 01:06:32,160
fans, they're, they're pumped,
they're pumped about it.

1145
01:06:32,160 --> 01:06:35,000
I know I've been talking to a
bunch of people and people that

1146
01:06:35,000 --> 01:06:37,120
have draft capital capital in
their leagues.

1147
01:06:37,120 --> 01:06:38,560
They're excited to see what
happens.

1148
01:06:39,000 --> 01:06:40,880
It's, it's always a great time
of the year.

1149
01:06:40,880 --> 01:06:43,560
You know, the NFL drafts, one of
the biggest events of the sports

1150
01:06:43,560 --> 01:06:46,560
calendar, and it's going to be
real fun and I'm looking forward

1151
01:06:46,560 --> 01:06:49,560
to breaking it down next week.
Absolutely.

1152
01:06:49,560 --> 01:06:52,440
It's one of the days we're
getting an offer of David

1153
01:06:52,440 --> 01:06:55,960
Montgomery in the 19.
Somehow it makes maybe it makes

1154
01:06:55,960 --> 01:06:58,040
it worth it.
It's going to be a tremendous

1155
01:06:58,040 --> 01:07:01,440
value at the 109 that is going
to make it worth it to give up

1156
01:07:01,440 --> 01:07:04,000
Jeremiah Love for David
Montgomery in the 109.

1157
01:07:05,560 --> 01:07:08,480
That this is that.
That that is not dynasty

1158
01:07:08,480 --> 01:07:09,600
insight.
That's what I would say.

1159
01:07:09,640 --> 01:07:12,120
Let's not take that as any
insight nobody wants.

1160
01:07:12,120 --> 01:07:14,000
That I don't know.
We don't know who's going to be

1161
01:07:14,000 --> 01:07:16,640
available.
Maybe the landing spots are just

1162
01:07:16,640 --> 01:07:19,680
going to be off the chart.
They're going to be off the

1163
01:07:19,680 --> 01:07:22,040
chart and we we don't know.
That's why you have to wait and

1164
01:07:22,040 --> 01:07:23,920
see.
Yeah, I mean, the only way I

1165
01:07:23,920 --> 01:07:26,680
would see that being an offer
you'd be interested in is if

1166
01:07:26,720 --> 01:07:30,880
Jeremiah Love somehow got
drafted to like the Pittsburgh

1167
01:07:30,880 --> 01:07:32,560
Pirates and now you're in
trouble.

1168
01:07:32,600 --> 01:07:34,800
So that's the only the only way
I could see that being.

1169
01:07:34,800 --> 01:07:38,960
Yeah, he comes out and draft and
he says I am choosing baseball

1170
01:07:39,360 --> 01:07:41,400
or something like that.
And like, I don't know.

1171
01:07:42,080 --> 01:07:45,560
I, I don't know.
It's guess what, we'll have to

1172
01:07:45,560 --> 01:07:47,240
wait and see.
It's just that it's all about

1173
01:07:47,240 --> 01:07:51,360
landing spot though.
Yeah, I know.

1174
01:07:51,360 --> 01:07:54,040
I want to thank everybody for
listening this week.

1175
01:07:54,720 --> 01:07:58,160
Certainly if you could do us a
favor, it'd be cool.

1176
01:07:58,160 --> 01:08:02,720
Sometimes I, I notice our our
podcast and I'm like, it'd be

1177
01:08:02,720 --> 01:08:06,080
cool if someone gave us a
ranking or gave us a review

1178
01:08:06,080 --> 01:08:09,080
somewhere, you know, where you
can just click on a podcast,

1179
01:08:09,480 --> 01:08:11,640
search for us.
And you said we're on, we're on

1180
01:08:11,640 --> 01:08:18,040
Spotify, we're on, you know, the
Apple iTunes and just give us a

1181
01:08:18,040 --> 01:08:19,479
rating.
That would be great.

1182
01:08:19,880 --> 01:08:23,359
Give us a, you know, short
review, you know, has to be

1183
01:08:23,359 --> 01:08:25,000
positive.
Otherwise we're going to come

1184
01:08:25,000 --> 01:08:27,359
and find you and we're going to
say what's the problem?

1185
01:08:27,680 --> 01:08:29,960
You know, you think you, you
think you could do it any

1186
01:08:29,960 --> 01:08:31,279
better?
No, I'm just kidding.

1187
01:08:31,479 --> 01:08:32,880
But no, I think that would be
nice.

1188
01:08:33,359 --> 01:08:36,560
It's it's always a lot of fun to
do this and next show is going

1189
01:08:36,560 --> 01:08:39,479
to be amazing.
So I want to thank everybody for

1190
01:08:39,479 --> 01:08:42,760
listening and I'll I'll talk to
you next week.